Now I don't have to worry about running into any of you jerks in the theater. I'm sure you all are going to stay home on your computers expressing your outrage from your stinky rooms instead of ruining my theater experience.
A screenwriter that uses source material as toilet paper, a mediocre director, and flipping the casting of an iconic character on nothing more than a whim to be progressive...I don't think you'll have to worry about anything more than the movie itself destroying your experience. BTW, lots of people are passionate about these books and are extremely disappointed to realize that if this gets made, there will never be a screen adaptation that even partially resembles the books. Oh, but we're all racist shut-in jerks, so we can go F ourselves.
There may racist jerks circling about but they are usually easy to spot.
I am deeply disappointed in what has happened with this series because a dynamic I very much wanted to see on-screen (and displayed on a broad spectrum to many) was the Susannah/Detta dynamic.
leave the material alone
In terms of literature and film this was a rare thing to see. A black woman with a powerful hatred of people based solely on the color of their skin.
I think that seeing this dynamic played out would have been a million times more effective to shine a light on the silliness of racism then casting a black man as Roland. It is so frustrating to hear people completely miss the boat in regards to what this shows.
"Oh but you just make Detta white and she can hate him just the same".
Completely missing the point that displays of white on black racism is a dime a dozen in today's society. Most blacks/minorities even expect it. I had a poor gentlemen tell me the other day that racism has always existed and always will exist. Both statements false...but he believed it. As do many others.
So what are you accomplishing by showing something everyone already expects to see?
Nothing. Congratulations.
leave the material alone
Another batch of the clueless think that having a black Roland is a "huge step forward". A lead! And he's black! Like me! Yes..and the President is black. I'm pretty sure that's a lead role...and yet...the world...still pretty crappy.
The lesson that should be learned from this is that "color" or "who is in charge" of our system is meaningless...much like racism.
Because the problems in our society stem far...far beyond that. Racism, like many of our societies ills...is a by-products of a much larger problem.
This is why the Susannah/Detta/Roland/Eddie dynamic is more compelling now than ever. It helps drill this point home.
"Roland doesn't care about race. Race doesn't really define him..." People utter these words as if they made some powerful closing argument. Then stand before the Jury like they just invented the circle.
**I shake my head in bafflement**
Yeah...you nitwit..it doesn't. To him it means nothing. To Detta...it means everything.
Just like it unfortunately means everything to millions of blacks who think that this is the most important problem in the world.
leave the material alone
Roland is beyond such non-sense. He actually has important things to worry about.
This is something I feel is important from someone with a pale face to project.
Roland doesn't care about Susan's color....he cares about her character. Roland doesn't care about Susan's gender...he cares about her character. Roland doesn't care about Susan's handicap...he cares about her character.
Poor, misguided fools.
In a time where the white man is vilified for everything imaginable how could such a dynamic between two people not be more important.
I wanted millions of blacks to see a black woman go from petty hatred base on skin color to shedding such non-sense so that she could address the bigger problem. To drop the shackles from her mind and embrace a powerful destiny. To be rewarded with love for herself and from others by doing so. And finally, for seeing that the white man...is not the enemy. That color...is not the enemy. That the true enemy lies within ourselves.
leave the material alone
It is without a doubt the most important message that can be shown to those who still hold on to such mental handicaps with a death-like grip.
The true problems of the world lie far beyond racism. If you do not open your eyes and see them it may be too late for us all.
Some think they are a combating racism by rallying behind Idris Elba. The truth is that they are doing themselves and everyone else a disservice.
The stories in their original form do more to thwart racism than Akiva and Nikolaj ever could. Because despite what they think...they are bringing nothing new to the table. Something a piece of fiction over thirty years old managed to accomplish.
Score one for the purists as they contemplate that sh*t on the *beep* tree of woe.
reply share
When I heard the Idris Elba was cast, I figured it meant that they would have to change Detta's and Roland's interaction. Because the race stuff wouldn't make much sense if they're both black.
I'm okay with such a change. I always saw a lot (most) of Detta's dislike of Roland being about her fear and confusion of the ordeal she's going through, being pulled into a strange world by men she doesn't know. Detta imagines several mistreatments at the hands of Roland and Eddie because those things make more sense to her than dealing with the reality of her newfound situation. IMO, trauma and stress, not race, are at the heart of Detta's behavior (especially if you factor in that the emergence of Detta is largely linked to trauma and stress in Odetta's life).
So, yeah, make Roland black, get rid of the racial component, and make it all about the trauma works for me. Especially since so much of Detta sounds, as Eddie points out, like a racist caricature/stereotype, and I'm not convinced it could translate well to screen.
And after reading this...
I wanted millions of blacks to see a black woman go from petty hatred base on skin color to shedding such non-sense so that she could address the bigger problem. To drop the shackles from her mind and embrace a powerful destiny. To be rewarded with love for herself and from others by doing so. And finally, for seeing that the white man...is not the enemy. That color...is not the enemy. That the true enemy lies within ourselves.
Holy yikes! I feel like I need to shower reading it, it's so fricking gross.
Like "millions of blacks" need PSA from white folks on racism.
The idea that a person could read the book, thinking this...
That people might sit in a movie theater, thinking this...
Yikes.
I was happy with the casting of Elba before, but now I am THRILLED with it. And I really really hope it does mean they change the race angle between Roland and Detta, so no one is at all able to read that junk you posted into it.
reply share
Holy yikes! I feel like I need to shower reading it, it's so fricking gross.
meleractor is a high-functioning troll that goes for "quality" over quantity (at least so far as the "The Dark Tower" board goes).
I pointed out how he/she was ignorant of the sociopolitical background of Mid-World (particularly the barony Roland hails from) and how classism was the issue instead of racism (indeed, there is no proof that Roland would have been held back from becoming a gunslinger had he sported a different melanin content much less lynched if he looked at a woman with lighter features). The response I received back from them was a transparent parody of what a social justice warrior might say.
As an aside, it is funny how many people are aching to see a black woman be unrepentantly and viciously racist on the silver screen.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
reply share
Holy yikes! I feel like I need to shower reading it, it's so fricking gross.
I know, right? White people are the enemy, and they better not forget it! I hope that piece of sh!t you replied to loses his job and his kids starve. What an evil privileged white scumbag. I don't like the way blood money spends. reply share
Holy yikes! I feel like I need to shower reading it, it's so fricking gross.
Like "millions of blacks" need PSA from white folks on racism.
The idea that a person could read the book, thinking this...
That people might sit in a movie theater, thinking this...
Yikes.
I was happy with the casting of Elba before, but now I am THRILLED with it. And I really really hope it does mean they change the race angle between Roland and Detta, so no one is at all able to read that junk you posted into it.
You have no idea how much I agree with this! I AM a person of color and thought the same thing. Yes, PLEASE tell me that racism is a "shackle" in MY mind. Okie dokey.
At any rate, Detta's insanity and white-hot hatred made her an interesting nemesis for Roland and Eddie. Her hatred was understandable - from the perspective of being victimized. King did an excellent job, as usual, at creating nuances that allowed the reader to both hate Detta and still retain the smallest kernel of understanding and even sympathy.
I'm excited to see Idris become The Gunslinger.
reply share
I am deeply disappointed in what has happened with this series because a dynamic I very much wanted to see on-screen (and displayed on a broad spectrum to many) was the Susannah/Detta dynamic.
...
In terms of literature and film this was a rare thing to see. A black woman with a powerful hatred of people based solely on the color of their skin.
I think that seeing this dynamic played out would have been a million times more effective to shine a light on the silliness of racism then casting a black man as Roland. It is so frustrating to hear people completely miss the boat in regards to what this shows.
I agree that it is rare to see this kind of dynamic in literature and on film. However, if the filmmakers go with the simplest solution to this dilemma, O/Detta/Susannah can remain the way she is without having to change much. That being the case, even with Elba being cast as Roland, everything you've described here concerning black-on-white hatred can still play out with Eddie. It could be said that O/Detta/Susannah's relationship with Eddie ends up being even more profound compared to her relationship with Roland in that she not only progresses from her initial violent hatred to mutual respect, but she falls in love with Eddie. As for how the dynamic would change, Detta's hatred in this scenario would be two-pronged instead: her hatred of white people - especially white men - and her hatred of black people who "betray their own." Both messages, IMO, would be important for people to see, regardless of their race.
Roland is beyond such non-sense. He actually has important things to worry about.
This is something I feel is important from someone with a pale face to project.
Roland doesn't care about Susan's color....he cares about her character. Roland doesn't care about Susan's gender...he cares about her character. Roland doesn't care about Susan's handicap...he cares about her character.
Poor, misguided fools.
In a time where the white man is vilified for everything imaginable how could such a dynamic between two people not be more important.
I wanted millions of blacks to see a black woman go from petty hatred base on skin color to shedding such non-sense so that she could address the bigger problem. To drop the shackles from her mind and embrace a powerful destiny. To be rewarded with love for herself and from others by doing so. And finally, for seeing that the white man...is not the enemy. That color...is not the enemy. That the true enemy lies within ourselves.
The alleged vilification of white men for "everything imaginable" aside, why single out black people, as if they're the only ones who need this valuable lesson? As far as I can tell, people of all races could benefit from seeing something like this on screen.
Overall, I do get the points you're trying to make, and I understand your passion. The Dark Tower is a great story and you, like many other fans, want it to be told right. However, Roland being played by a black actor does not automatically mean the movie adaptation is inevitably doomed to fail. Also, hinging your aspirations for the betterment of race relations on this adaptation seems a bit misguided. But I agree with Pericles3614 - that was a strong post.
reply share
What a brilliant post, you have totally nailed it. I could never understand why one of the strongest BLACK FEMALE characters in fiction would be watered down . People who keep saying that they could change her are so missing the wonderful way she changed from being a complete racist against whites to loving Roland and being in love with Eddie. They didn't need a strong black lead because they already had one.
are so missing the wonderful way she changed from being a complete racist against whites to loving Roland and being in love with Eddie.
That was the evil split personality of DETTA WALKER. Odetta/Susannah "changed" because Roland used a magical doorway to magically meld the "Goad" with the woman's primary personality. Odetta/Susannah loved Eddie from the start. Odetta/Susannah came to respect Roland despite her fear of his sometimes robotic and scarily focused mentality...not because he had a lighter shade of skin.
There was no inherent racism on the character's behalf and she did not slowly plus naturally change on that subject over time.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
reply share
I was not responding to the original poster. So, in fact, not responding to a parody. So congratulations on not even knowing what you're talking about weirdo!
Don't try to imply that he is somehow engaging in cleverly subversive social commentary meant to aid the disenfranchised and discrimination. His history does not speak to it.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
and i guess that if this is appropriate casting...then we should consider perhaps using Scarlett Johansson in the remake of the colour purple ...she's make a wonderful Celie..wouldn't she?
Minorities whenever a character not originally white is played by a white actor: "The evil directors whitewashed the part, how dare they change the characters race? The film is racist"
Minorities when studios change a white character's race for PC reasons: "Why are people complaining about this casting? It's perfect casting. Race isn't important"
There's more reason to believe that's the reason for his casting than anything else, he doesn't suit the role in any way at all. Remove that from the list of potential reasons why he was cast and what's left? Cheap PC publicity stunt, they get the media attention when the fans of the books understandably react against the casting. And they get to play the racism card to get even more attention for it.
So by your logic, Depp was cast in Lone Ranger because he was best for the part (they didn't come out and say otherwise). And all these supposed cases of white washing in films must have been purely because they were the best choice too right? Since no one ever came out and said they wanted to make the characters black.
The thing about a publicity stunt with PC casting, it wouldn't work if they came out and say it. They announce their ridiculous casting, wait for fans to react and claim race isn't important all the while accusing anyone who says anything against it of racism and having a handy excuse when it bombs.
You're clearly starting out at "PC!!!!!" and working backwards from there. Why? Because you're so arrogant that you can't possibly imagine a world where there can be an valid interpretation of the book that differs substantially from your own (see also: your implication that true "fans of the books" are all against Elba's casting)
If that's not the case, please, show us concrete, substantial proof. Give us a quote from a filmmaker or studio head where they say he was cast as a stunt. If all you can offer is conjecture, you're just talking out of your ass.
I find Oscar Bait infinitely more interesting than ticket bait
Anyone that claims to be a book fan that likes Elba's casting was never really much of a fan. To support a casting that changes so much, it ignores any and all descriptions of the character from book and ruins the character interactions with Detta.
The thing about stunt casting is they rarely come out and say it's a stunt casting for attention, wouldn't be wise would it. Think you fool. Well there's two options, either they are deliberately trying to be PC or they've not bothered reading any of the books and actually believe this is good casting (you can even work out that Elba is terrible for Roland by a glance at Wikipedia).
As a person who has read all the books many many times i have reservations. I am a fan of Idris Elba and very much enjoy watching Luther and would encourage all to do so. While i cant say i saw clint eastwood as roland.. i didnt see i.e. either. All i can say is that i am going to withhold judgement until i can see the trailer.
Until I hear why the choice of Roland was made i wont presume the pc worst.
I made you a souffle, but it was too beautiful to live. Oswin Dr Who Asylum of the Daleks
If you prefaced that Elba being cast in the role of Roland Deschain was a politically correct stunt as an opinion, you'd receive a lot less flack.
As is, you consistently come off as a pompous jackass that likes to whip out the "No True Scotsman" fallacy in regards to one's status as a fan over the "The Dark Tower" series (should they not agree with your obviously impeccable and emotionless logic...convenient, that) and state opinions verging on conspiracy theories as fact. Then, there was that time where you wished bodily harm on Elba and at least part of the production crew. Not cool at all.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
Would love to see the reaction of the "nothing wrong with a black man playing Roland" brigade when Justin Bieber plays Malcolm X in the forthcoming bio pic.
Would love to see the reaction of the "nothing wrong with a black man playing Roland" brigade when Justin Bieber plays Malcolm X in the forthcoming bio pic.
A couple of things. 1) A Malcolm X biopic already exists; it came out 24 years ago and was directed by Spike Lee. 2) I'm going to assume you're being facetious (at least, I hope you are), because this is a false equivalence.
reply share
For all the pedants amongst us, it was simply an attempt give an alternative casting which obviously zoomed high above your heads.
So will try once again.
Anyone care to show absolute and definitive proof from the book that Roland was anything but a tall rangy and skinny white bloke and that Detta was anything but a black racist who hated Roland with every breath in her body.
Anyone care to show absolute and definitive proof from the book that Roland was anything but a tall rangy and skinny white bloke and that Detta was anything but a black racist who hated Roland with every breath in her body.
Why? All the text in the novels is there for anyone to peruse.
The movie is going forward and who's cast is cast.
No...what the the real question is, is this: can the cast work in the context of the adaptation's story and particularly with the basics of the characters in the source material they ultimately originated from?
As for my answer? I think that, with a little adjustment, they sure can.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
reply share
For all the pedants amongst us, it was simply an attempt give an alternative casting which obviously zoomed high above your heads.
Oh, I understood what you were trying to say just fine. The thing is, the point you were trying to make with your "alternative casting" still falls flat because, as I said before, the comparison you're trying to make is inaccurate. Long story short, casting a black man to play Roland Deschain =/= casting a white man to play Malcolm X.
Anyone care to show absolute and definitive proof from the book that Roland was anything but a tall rangy and skinny white bloke and that Detta was anything but a black racist who hated Roland with every breath in her body.
No one has argued or is arguing this. Everyone who's read the books knows both of these things. But, as Captain_Wesker has already mentioned, the filmmakers have chosen and cast their Roland, whether we like it or not. And Elba not being a Clint Eastwood lookalike doesn't necessarily mean the movie is doomed to fail. You can either give the actor a chance, or you can stick to the books and wait for a possible reboot. That's completely up to you.
reply share
you will be safe, because I will not be there to what they call a movie, I am a fan of King and I have read the books and I love them. They are not keeping true to the story line and that makes me sad. Whenever they stray from the heart of the books then they make something else and, therefore, they should change the name.