It is by far my favorite fantasy series, but I won't be watching this...
....because in my mind Roland will always be a young Clint Eastwood and I need to keep it that way for my next re-read of the series
share....because in my mind Roland will always be a young Clint Eastwood and I need to keep it that way for my next re-read of the series
shareYou are making the right choice. Won't be alone in that choice either, will just be a small handful of fools wasting their money to watch this dreck. But then they can't spoil the book version of Roland for themselves, because that would imply they've actually read the books at all.
shareI'd bet my life savings you're full of *beep* and will undoubtedly see this when it opens. Don't act so cool.
shareI really, truly wanted to see it. Last time I read the series, all I thought was: This is so awesome, how can it be its not a movie yet! But if this happened, god knows what else they changed.
To tell you the truth I couldn't get those faces out of my mind when I read game of thrones after just seeing a few episodes so........I will surely skip this one!
I am very disappointed Stephen King allowed any changes at all
I am very disappointed Stephen King allowed any changes at all
How about Scott Eastwood he is too young but they could roughen him up a bit and he would be perfect
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2207222/?ref_=nv_sr_2
From what I recall, Scott Eastwood's filmography has been less than spectacular. Unless he pulls a previously unseen rabbit out of his hat, I don't think he could manage it, even with a make-up making him ageless.
Damion Crowley
Who knows but that, on the lower frequencies, I speak for you.--R.E.
He doesn't have the acting ability to pull off Roland of Gilead. No thanks .
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
Nah. I really don't know. It's a tough cast.
My top tier picks would be Javier Bardem or Daniel Day Lewis.
Then Josh Brolin or Viggo.
Then Thomas Jane or Josh Halloway.
Or just get someone relatively unknown.
____________________________
Death is the road to awe.
Yeah and that tool pouch captain whiskers bisquit has the audacity to post a thread on the ghost in the shell board about how making the mayor white is wrong.then he takes it down after I pointed out to him how he talks out of both of his neck.
shareOh he's completely full of sh*t, he goes round this and the Spider-man board (a board he never once appeared on until people complained about the potential poor casting of MJ) spouting on about how race is unimportant. Yet he's all over any board with a white actor cast in a role not originally white endlessly b*tching about race changing.
It's social justice morons like him and his ilk that caused the boards to be shutdown.
I don't give a rats *beep* what they did to Roland. Some sh*t is more important. Eddie *beep* Dean, one of the best *beep* characters King has ever or will ever write isn't in it. Sony Pictures can *beep* right off, who gives a *beep* about anything else seriously. With that fact alone you couldn't pay me to watch this dumpster fire, and I have read every Dark Tower book 3 *beep* times.
How many dead babies does it take to make these idiots go bankrupt?
In all fairness, the first film has to introduce so very much. Perhaps it is for the best Eddie, Odetta/Susannah, Oy, etc make their debut appearances in the sequel?
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
There is no sequel, this movie is based on all 7 volumes, says so right in the description. Click the spoiler under frequently asked questions you will see for yourself.
share@beans_of_steel, very assertive statement there but you're uninformed. There's more accurate information out there than what it says in the description. This film is a sequel. This film will have a sequel. A tv series is in the works to depict the events in book 4, etc. Elba has confirmed to appear in it. This film draws elements from all 7 books, that's not the same as it's based and tells the full story of all 7 books.
Books are a uniquely portable magic. ~Stephen King
Rumors out there is pretty vague. No it's not confirmed if it were it would be on IMDB by now. Got proof? I'd love to see it. Even if there is, not using the film as an opportunity to introduce the best character in the series is *beep* idiotic. Also Eddie is in books 2 thru 7 so if the tv series is about 4 they are still messing up huge, cutting past the 2 amazing books in the series Drawing Of The Three and The Waste Lands. So no full story of how Roland met Eddie, or Detta and Odetta and how they became Susannah, no three of them working together to kill Shardik and or bring Jake back through the speaking ring, no Lud, no Tick Tock Man, no Blaine the Mono, or all that amazing stuff passed over in favor of a *beep* summed up flashback or exposition, no thanks.
shareGood keyword, f*ucking idiotic. If you take everything IMDb says or said for fact, go watch The Dark Tower movie starring Javier Bardem from 2012. Enjoy.
Books are a uniquely portable magic. ~Stephen King
That page with Bardem doesn't exist anymore it was taken down when the project didn't make out of the pre-production phase, happens all the time, if the choice is between IMDB and the no proof at all from a board troll, I'll choose IMDB go back to your uneducated hobby of lying on a site you now hate. You enjoy it. At least for 5 more days LOL
sharehttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt1648190/board/flat/259334726
There may be elements of all seven books in this initial installment of what the producers hope will be a cinematic franchise, but the film isn't trying to cover the breadth of all seven books within itself. Given that there is going to be a television series based around "Wizard and Glass" and given that people associated with the production of "The Dark Tower (2017)" have spoke of a sequel (in fact it was mentioned that Suze and Eddie would show up in a sequel if one were greenlit)..your declaration doesn't look like it would hold up for long.
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
It's gonna suck and it won't be getting a sequel, cuz if elements of all 7 books are included in this film and they want people to care enough to want a sequel or a tv series, they made a huge mistake leaving out a key element, that element being the best written character in the series, and if you don't agree with my opinion on that, just take another look at the books, it's pretty hard to read them and not come to the conclusion that Eddie Dean at the very least has the most entertaining dialogue in the series. Great dialogue is kind of a stupid thing to leave out of a film based on books, especially if the survival of the franchise is dependent on the strength of that film.
shareThe film has a limited runtime in which to introduce Roland, Jake, Walter/The Man in Black, Mid-World, the New York of Jake's when, the concept of ka, the titular tower, the Shine (and the Breakers), etc. I'd rather see the other members of the ka-tet being recruited when there's time to breathe. Also, I don't know about you, but i've see what happens when too much is squeezed into one film (The Last Airbender)...and it ain't pretty.
and if you don't agree with my opinion on that, just take another look at the books, it's pretty hard to read them and not come to the conclusion that Eddie Dean at the very least has the most entertaining dialogue in the series.
I did not forget that, by Stephen King standards the Gunslinger is simply good (rightly so as it is one of the first stories he ever wrote, remember 19) I was not hooked after reading i read it put the series aside for better books until years later when I decided to try the 2nd, if the series is truly dependent on the strength of the first film and they are talking the Dark Tower and not just doing the gunslinger. They need to get the audience hooked somehow, if it were my call I'd say Roland losing his fingers to the lobstrosities is the best way to start it, then go into the story of gunslinger story which is ok to rush through a bit as it's the shortest, and many of the flashbacks can always be saved for a later film or show if or when the franchise becomes a success, after which the impact of his injury is fully realized, then he enters the door of the prisoner and draws Eddie then the film ends. Non readers would enjoy it so would fans, this way am not so sure.
shareHi, Beans! Gonna weigh in a little here if you and the Captain don't mind me doing so.
I hear you! I wasn't entirely crazy about the first installment, but it has very important groundwork for the subsequent books. It gives you the first good look at Roland, and what he's willing to do in his desperation to reach the Tower. It also introduces Jake Chambers, who is going to be integral to the story. I do agree that Eddie is one of the greatest characters, but as the Captain said, wouldn't you rather get a proper introduction to him? Trying to cram his introduction into this installment would be an injustice to what that character deserves. If they could manage a single movie that is almost entirely Drawing of the Three, I know I'd be a happy girl, but I think first we need to learn more about who the gunslinger is and what exactly he's doing.
Don't forget, this is supposed to follow up the books as a sequel, so this story is going to have alterations. I mean, all adaptations do, but at least the sequel angle explains why there are alterations to the story.
In an ideal universe, a (relatively) straight adaptation would begin with a three-and-a-half to four hour long installment that was comprised of the totality of The Gunslinger* and The Drawing of the Three with intermission somewhere in the middle. Only, we don't live in that ideal universe. The Dark Tower isn't as big and famous a name in the realm of entertainment as The Lord of the Rings is. Furthermore, the economy now isn't the same as it was at the turn of the century. Having the content of seven novels (each one growing increasing larger and, to the opinion of many readers, increasingly bloated with material that doesn't work on the silver screen from the fifth book onwards) filmed back to back on moderate to weak faith alone isn't a financial risk movie studios are willing to take.
* Seeing events prior to The Gunslinger would be nice...if only for variety and to educate beginners on the worlds of The Dark Tower.
---
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
I dunno Capt', there are leaked pics of Roland exiting a NY gun shop. That makes me believe that they may skip Eddie all together. Of course, this is only speculation.
shareThat makes me believe that they may skip Eddie all together. Of course, this is only speculation.
I dunno Capt', there are leaked pics of Roland exiting a NY gun shop. That makes me believe that they may skip Eddie all together. Of course, this is only speculation.Hey there - this might help. Check out the "Two Lost Companions" section near the bottom of the article.
They've included Tirana (a character people who actually read the books, so you wouldn't know her) and villains who only appear in the last few books. So that whole 'it's only the first film' excuse doesn't fly. If it was an actual adaption of the books and not in name only *beep* made by a director whose never read the books in his life, then maybe that would be a reason.
share