Most of these shows about Aliens, Bigfoot, Ghosts and other beings/entities are shows about no-shows, so instead you get a lot of stories, theories and conspiracies thrown around and leaves it up to the viewer to decide.
What mostly puzzles me about Bigfoot are the contradicting "facts".
For example his appearance compared to its supposed capabilities.
A seemingly primitive looking giant being that can move at lightning speed, probably even traveling through dimensions and time, i mean.. what do official Bigfoot followers say?
Where is the middle road on its existence? Do most believers accept that it can disappear in the blink of an eye without a trace? Is it ageless? Are there more?
What's up with the primitive outfit?
Is it a disguise? If so, why not choose something less suspicious, since if it is a disguise, its appearance might not really be affecting its alleged ability to disappear in the blink of an eye without any trace of DNA, hairs or whatsoever.
Also, this means that it doesnt seem to actually travel a lot by using its big feet, otherwise it would leave trails everywhere it went, something a lot more substantial than the reported smell and footprints so far, or even the half-eaten animal carcasses credited as its dinner, once again, no hairs, no DNA?
Also, if it knows about us, as a supposed highly intelligent being, it would be aware of the density of the human population and possibly our talks about it, some reports of sightings say that it responded to the humans by disappearing instantly, so it knows that it got caught, why doesnt it adapt or change tactics by now?
Also, where is the purpose in all of this, why allow yourself to be spotted by random amateur people in the woods (supposing that all of this were true), how can it be this sloppy and yet still manage to remain a mystery for this long?
These are things where they lose me, not that i dont want to believe, but the evidence in general is not helping me to commit to any of it. So I'd rather put it alongside ghosts or UFO's, or even religion for the same reasons.
I cant remember when AA compared or linked Goliath to Bigfoot, but i would chalk that up together with the "Aliens & Zombies" theories as one of their bolder claims, explaining nothing other than tying mythical knots, or connecting mythical dots together, sending you back into the woods, with a bit of luck, you might spot Bigfoot in there :P
reply
share
syed-00500
8 years ago
Big foot is fictional....dont worry too much. It all started in the 50s when a bunch of hoaxers tried to scare their ccoworkers in the woods by creating giant footprints... that's it and from there it got out of control when local newspaper printed about that... lol
reply
share
Crustacean_Predation
8 years ago
Sasquatches have been reported in the west for over a century before the 50s and local tribes have lore about it dating back many hundreds of years.
reply
share
CashIsSupreme
8 years ago
They also have hundreds of years of lore about thunderbirds so is there a point to your post?
reply
share
WhoToTrust
8 years ago
by CashIsSupreme ยป They also have hundreds of years of lore about thunderbirds so is there a point to your post?
The point of CP's post was very clear. The lore/stories have been around much longer than the previous poster was suggesting and on which he was basing his overall conclusion.
reply
share
CashIsSupreme
8 years ago
So folk tales and myths = credible evidence?
reply
share
WhoToTrust
8 years ago
Why does it always end up being the go to strategy of "skeptics" here to try to discredit their fellow human beings?
I imagine it would be a different story if someone were categorically dismissing stories your personal ancestors were saying had happened to them.
reply
share