So Anyone Can Steal Your Time?
It's like walking around with a bankcard with your life savings with no pin number required!
It's like walking around with a bankcard with your life savings with no pin number required!
I was wondering the same, why not kill everyone around you to increase your time?
"Gar nicht so übel, du kleine Schlampe. Man sieht sich immer zweimal, Kleine."
Perhaps that was the point!
SpiltPersonality
When someone was killed (e.g. by gunshot) they no longer held any transferable time.
shareit's possible to actually kill someone by stealing all of that person's time, because once someone runs out of time they die.
In the movie Will actually killed Fortis by taking all of his time during a duel.
Yeah, that's what I didn't really get. Not Will killing the minuteman, but the minuteman killing the guy at the fence a scene earlier. Why did he let him?
If they'd kill me anyways, I'd go for the bullet because *beep* them.
With how things work, it would have been interesting if they introduced the concept that after you kill someone (ex: gunshot or push them off a cliff), then their time would be transferred to you. So if someone had fifteen years, their time would go to you basically. It would have made things much darker if it brought us into a world where the crime rate is through the roof because time is limited and people are going to extreme lengths to get it.
Another possibility that could have made things fascinating is if, this rule exists in this universe, is that a group of hitmen offer their services for those in need exchange for a cut of the profit. Prices would range from person to person; with those who are lower class and considered "less desirable" would cost anything from six months to two years, and those who are upper class or have a *beep* ton of time (like celebrities, politicians, and government officials) could run up to over ten years of your own. [ex: Someone has twenty years left; you get eleven and they get nine -- Someone has 200 years left; you get 115 and they get 85]
Then again, I'm not sure how we'd have time for romance if there was murder and mayhem in the streets at almost any given time.
Our songs will all be silenced, but what of it? Go on singing. -- Orson Welles
Yeah, that was a bit strange. At first I thought it had to be a voluntary thing, like when Will's mother gave him 30 mins at the start.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAIJ3Rh5Qxs
I know right?!?! This whole timer thing is beyond nuts!
тrυe coυrage ιѕ noт aвoυт ĸnowιng wнen тo тaĸe a lιғe, вυт wнen тo ѕpare one.
No - it's like walking around with a wallet filled with money.
Don't you get it? In this story money is a allegoration for money. Poor people working hard for a few coins and could lose them all in a dark alley - while the rich ones have just too much of it and walk around with bodyguards to protect their wealth.
https://media.giphy.com/media/V0wSSQl3e4Ao0/giphy.gif
Good point!
But your wallet is usually somehow hidden, not showing open on your arm...
I don't get why they only used sleeves to cover it, and not something a bit smarter (especially the rich ones).
for the majority of the movie, the rich and the poor were separated, living in different areas of the city and separated by alot of secure gates & fences...in normal circumstances the rich would not need to cover their arms because the rich don't need to steal time from others. It's because of their life of luxury and normally surrounded by other rich people, it makes sense that the rich people in particular would feel less inclined to cover their arms, they would usually feel safe where they live and most of them probably never would've traveled to the poor areas of the city. It's really the poor people living in the ghettos who needed to be alot more cautious and careful about protecting their time in order to survive, because of the area where they live is much more dangerous.
shareHmmm you may be right, but the least rich may be interested in taking on some of the wealth of the top, since crazy wealth means immortality (or close).
shareit could happen but I doubt it would be common occurrence, many of the residents living in the wealthy area of Greenwich all seem to be rich in their own right, I doubt they would resort to stealing from someone else, and the more richer people would probably have tight security following them around. If a rich person were to take another rich person's time, the most likely way they would do that is probably through legitimate gambling at the casino or something, such as in the scene when we saw Will Salas gambling with his time during a poker match with Sylvia's father at the casino...I don't think the rich would resort to petty theft.
But the ghettos is the place that's much more dangerous and where the poor barely have enough time to live day by day, that's where most of the desperate and some downright greedy people live and where petty theft happens practically everyday, especially with Fortis' barbaric gang of thieves constantly roaming around the area and stealing as much time as they can get their hands on.
Fair enough.
shareThe only way the rich could live their live like they did was by separating with the workers who take care about their necessities. I didn't see robots or androids serving them. They need food and all that.
Since nobody would accept such setting (we still do) they simply threaten the slave work force with death if they don't deliver. They even don't pay them money, they pay them with time-of-not-dying.
Nice for the premise, but it wouldn't work. If 1 Million people ready to die storm the palace they would manage to kill at least half of the "immortals". With a glitch in the system at the wrong time and place, someone would die who is absolutely important for the "immortals" to survive. There are too many variables in such kind of society. As we see in the movie, people die because they are too late to places. They must drop like flies.
[deleted]
yeah, they should have had some security protocols in place. you'd only want to sleep in a locked room.
share