Jesus! I couldn't watch full movie 'cause she looks like a child and all of that looked like a freaking child porn! Couldn't they found a woman that actually looks like a woman and not like a 12 yeard old and no, it's not 'cause she has small boobs!
Fool is the man whose madness does not mach the madness of most.
When have you ever seen a 12 year old with hips like that? When have you ever seen a 12 year old with such sharp, matured facial features (look at her nose)?
shareSeriously? What hips??? She's not tall (which is not bad when we look at her outside movie), she's almost flat, has no hips (models should not be measure for what probably more then 80% of modern women look like so again, no, she has no hips) and she has a baby face and if she had shaved all of her pubic hair, here you go, a child.
Anyway, she did a good job regarding her acting skills as for what I have seen, considering I haven't seen entire movie.
Fool is the man whose madness does not mach the madness of most.
Are you blind?
http://www.visualhollywood.com/movies_2011/sleeping_beauty/photos_stud io/data/images1/lucy_(emily_browning)_in_lingerie_01.jpg
http://www.jessmcb.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/bodyshapes.jpg
Yeah.. that's pretty much an hourglass figure, plus a full, feminine behind.
Do you need more?
Also,
She's not tall
My point, by saying she's not tall was just comparison to my statement why she looks minor to me in this movie. Well, maybe 'cause in my country averag hight of a teenager is 5'5'' and of an adult woman 5'8'' and that is averga, women can be much taller than that and some are, I found Emily's hight to be more "suitable" to a child.
Regarding her hips, again, she has no hips. These are hips in a grown woman:
http://goo.gl/QBPVK
http://goo.gl/SJN5y
http://goo.gl/83Y60
http://goo.gl/lNldZ
But apparently we are talking about taste in beauty, so ...
Fool is the man whose madness does not mach the madness of most.
These are not the hips, ass, and thighs of a child. She definitely has a mature body. She wasn't completely shaven either, you can clearly see it when the second man rolls her over. She just has small breasts which isn't her fault. And I actually commend her for not succumbing to the pressure to get implants like so many others do. And at least when she's 60 years old, they'll be in the same place and not down to her naval.
http://www.blogdaddy.com/actriz/emily-browning.php
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8CxUfryTuVk/TdNkFf8XhtI/AAAAAAAABBc/p8VO_GDU n3M/s1600/emily+browning.jpg
http://celebritieshot4u.blogspot.com/2011/10/emily-browning-sleeping-b eauty-promos.html
http://celebritieshot4u.blogspot.com/2011/10/emily-browning-sleeping-b eauty-promos.html
she has no hipsYou are wrong. This is not about tastes or opinion. You are actually wrong in the absolute sense of the word. You might as well be telling me that grass is red, and I prove you wrong by showing you a picture, and you still don't see it. Look again:
People like you should be thrown in the sea.
--------------------------------
Hitler was a dog person.
she doesnt look like a minor to me. she has small boobs thats all
shareYou can also tell by the curve of the back to pelvis, with age the pelvis tilts. For childbirth, but regardless thats how you can tell. And the "thigh gap" whether you have a visible one or not, it tech. exsist bc of the spacing of the pelvis. She just doesnt have very big hips, and hips differ to woman. She not a child nor child looking. As for her tits, she is lucky, l wish mine were that tiny.
shareShe's NOT a child--that's the point. 99 percent of heterosexual men are attracted to "barely legal" girls like Browning. Probably less than 1 percent are attracted to children. As for "minors", if by that you mean underage teenagers, it's probably somewhere in between, but if you're not going around committing statutory rape, who cares?
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sometimes people (like me) are attracted to cute 20-year-old girls with slender hips and small breasts because they're attracted to cute 20-year-old girls with slender hips and small breasts. There's absolutely nothing nefarious about it. But if any pedophiles ARE sublimating their perversions into adult women that look like Browning, I don't consider that a bad thing either. Isn't being a repressed pedophile better than a practicing pedophile?
Okay, you have a very specific idea of what a minor has to look like and how it concerns you artistic taste. Your taste, your rules. Eye of the beholder. I know.
But one question comes to mind: In your book, when will Emily Browning, the actress, be allowed to have sex? When she stops looking like a girly? When she grows the body of Catherine Zeta-Jones? Is that a valid measure not to count as a child? Because... her getting there might take a very long time and probably has to involve some reincarnations.
I know 12-13 year olds who are much bigger little women than she is. Taller, to say the least.
But you do make a valid point. If an adult actor Plays an adult character in a movie for adults (and certainly does not pretend to be a Child in this role ) it's just fine and a small body and youthful face is not an argument here, because that's just how some consenting individuals look.
-> Achievement unlocked