My library has this.


I think it's fair to say that this film contains some events that are disturbing and perverse.

It features full-frontal nudity of a very young-looking actress together with full-frontal nudity of men who are 60+ years old.

Why does my library have it?

I don't protest the movie itself, but who made the decision to commit public funds to this particular movie?

I'm tempted to send the library a suggestion for purchase for some triple-X films and see what happens.

_______
"I'm looking for the boy with the shimmer wine."

reply

Libraries carry lots of movies. It may be unrated, but it's not a porno. I'm sure you have to be 17 to check it out, but that's standard.

reply

Actually, most libraries do not monitor the age of who's checking out what; at least not here in the US. It's not our job (I'm a public librarian) to monitor what your children borrow, so any parent who cares has two options: Go to the library WITH them, or have the library put a restrictive note on their account. We will respect your wishes, but cannot read your mind - also can't control the self-check machines, LOL.

Now you (the OP) ask "why use public funds on this?" The simple answer is because somebody thought it was a good film, possibly even a patron suggested it, and/or it suits their collection. Not to mention, very little of our money still comes from government funds these days... here in California, we only get funding from local taxpayers, our nonprofit Friends organization, private endowments, and a little from the County budget. NO state, NO federal. Nice, huh?

reply

Our library also gets money from the annual used book sale, which is a massive event that everyone in town tends to show up for. I don't always buy books during that sale (I did two years ago), but my family and I donate books, sometimes box loads, every other year or so.

I got Sleeping Beauty at the library as well. It did occur to me that I was watching this movie from the library lol, but I'm so grateful for them. I just found today, in fact, our library also has several GoPro Cameras to check out (they also just built a small, but effective video and music production studio). It's ridiculous how cool our library is.

To the OP, I assume libraries also carry extremely popular movies because they make bank on the late fees (at least for people who pay up) and "lost and paid" situations. Sadly, I notice a lot of DVDs are often labeled as "missing", so there will always be a-holes who steal from the library.

reply

P.S. For the record, I'm just catching a bit of the movie right now (on Sundance), and don't find it particularly interesting. But my opinion isn't the only opinion, and neither is yours. ;-)

reply

My library has "Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma", by Pier Paolo Pasolini. ...


I'm Winston Wolf. I solve problems.

...And no dream is ever... just a dream...

reply

[deleted]

It's by far the most disturbing film I have ever watched (and I'm pretty accustomed to violence and so on), even if I watched it for the first time many years ago, when I was a kid.
It has all you said: physical, sexual and also psychological violence, ending in mutilations, and even much worse.
My advice is: advoid it! You don't need to watch it.
(So, if one should find it by chance at the library, they better know what they're going to watch)


I'm Winston Wolf. I solve problems.

...And no dream is ever... just a dream...

reply

Thanks for the advice. I'd stick to not watching it then. Sexual violence haunts me actually. I read a summary of Sade's work and found it nauseating. Same thing with Antichrist, I refuse to watch it.

reply