MovieChat Forums > Exit Through the Gift Shop (2010) Discussion > MR Brainwash is a total fake, a joke, a ...

MR Brainwash is a total fake, a joke, a scam. NOT an artist.


This guy is not an artist, no way. At much, he is businessman. He basically hired people to do everything for him, from the set up of the gallery, to the very pieces of artwork. He bossed everyone around, he obviously had no moral values at all, he stole from all the people who helped him and gave him an insight into their world, to all those street artist. When he was told "it is time to show that street art is not about money, it is time to release your movie", he created a factory for his "art" and hired people to do everything for him. And then took credit for it. You can see what type of artist he is when is supposed to have 200 unique pieces done for the first visitors and just goes around throwing paint randomly at lined up copies on the floor.
And before you tell me all that BS about not getting "the message", about not knowing what I'm talking about, etc. etc. Let me tell you that I have been raised in an enviroment of artists. My mother herself is a painter and she also draws. She has studied a truckload of years for it (like you are supposed to), she makes her own frames, know about types of paint, of the instruments, lighting, technique, etc. She works giving classes at university. I'm saying all of this, to show you that I have seen (in her, and in friends of her) what a real artist is about, the sacrifice, the real passion, trying to show your emotions and thoughts to the world. This guy will never be an artist, all he ever was is a fat man with a video camera.

reply

I'd very much like someone to read my comment and tell me your opinion about it.

reply

i thought it was pretty clear that he was a scam artist by the end of the film

reply

Yes, that was the joke. It was more and more obvious the longer the movie went on but I guess I can say well done for catching it... The movie got some more serious and complex messages about the art world as well though.

reply

Mr. Brainwash is essentially a 21st century emulation of Warhol. Warhol did much of the same. Both men are socialites of their communities. They both got big by networking. From relentless self promotion to assembly line methodology, you're right: Mr. Brainwash a business man. A manufacturer.

However, I don't think your life experience gives you the authority to determine what is and isn't art. What you have described is craft. Nothing that you have mentioned actually has anything to do with art. How the art is created is no longer a requirement for art by definition. Welcome to the Post Modern Era.

Is art really about drawing and painting? Is it constricted to medium? Does art need to be about passion? Many athletes show passion day in and day out? Are they artists or does their lack of paintbrushes disqualify them?

I challenge you to take a look at this art through a new pair of glasses. Throw away your preconceptions of the artist needing to be a craftsman and try to understand what this work might actually mean.

(As an aside I am not endorsing the artist or his work. For the purpose of the post I would like to remain neutral. However it is important when looking at this work that we first acknowledge the difference between art and craft. Then we can begin to analyze the work.)

reply

No no no! Ruopollo. YOu are not getting the full and true message.

Mr. Brainwash IS an artist. He is one because he made art and people bought it. Simple and end of story.

Bansky is showing that so-called "sophisticated" art appreciators and critics decide who is a "real" artist based on b.s. and hype. There IS no such thing as truly good art. People like what they are told they are supposed to like. Or they rebel and decide to like what they are told they should dislike. Either way, with the proper promotion team, anyone could become a successful artist. Works for music and other art forms also.

That is the deeper message of this movie. The art world is a bunch of sheep, always seeking a new shepherd to tell them what is cool.

reply

So bsharporflat

>There IS no such thing as truly good art.

You are putting everyone and eerything in the same level. If I take a drawing from a 3 year old kid done in 10 seconds is the same as any other work of art ever made?

reply

This film is such a provocative x-ray of contemporary / street art – I love how you see and feel the whole range from the earnest and genuinely inspiring, to the utterly soul-devouring mockery of creative substance.

@ruopollo-1
I completely understand where you’re coming from. The term “artist” has been so utterly raped of substance that many artists are even reluctant to describe themselves as artists, since nowadays that term conjures images of monkeys finger-painting on canvases, and pederasts shilling their child porn as “art.”

But as much as I respect (even revere) drawing ability and classical skills and materials, it’s also clear to me that Banksy is making art, and he’s using a completely different skill set and tools to do so. Note that the art team who created MBW’s stuff used many or all of the exact same materials and processes. So, in my mind anyway, it seems very apparent that what’s missing from MBW’s plagiarized and witless rubbish is something more elusive and subtle than classical ability or material processes – what’s missing may be as ethereal as Meaning itself. Now, if we could reach a consensus on the definition of -that-, then maybe we'd get somewhere with an understanding of what art really is.

This is the era of populism and relativism though, so I reckon the galleries will remain stuffed with "art-like product" for quite some time.

@bsharporflat
I agree with your second point – that one of the key messages in the film is that the contemporary art scene isn’t about the art at all, it’s about marketing. Almost nobody gives a *beep* about the art (and those who do usually can’t afford to buy it, so they tend to create it instead), most people only care about the tawdry thrill of brushing a nipple against someone famous and/or perceived as “cool” and “now,” which is whoever throws the biggest show.

But your first comment is insane:

No no no! Ruopollo. YOu are not getting the full and true message.

Mr. Brainwash IS an artist. He is one because he made art and people bought it. Simple and end of story.

That’s the bloodless capitalist econophilosophy that has made the word “artist” synonymous with “cheap whore” and turned the galleries into brothels for the rich and famous. The problem with your claim that MBW is an artist because he made stuff he called art and people bought it, is that the word “art” has been redefined to mean “anything anyone says it is.” So the only difference between a snot-picker and an artist is whether or not the snot-picker sells his snots as art.

This is why the words “art” and “artist” have become meaningless, even repugnant to the majority of people in many first-world nations. They mean less than nothing now, because the only qualification allowed is whether or not you can convince some loser to buy your fart in a balloon as a “work of art.” And that’s complete B.S. that insults the work of every artist who successfully conveys a provocative concept or sensation with the power of visual poetics.

If we refuse to recognize or acknowledge that special shine of quality and substance…that light that makes us feel wonder…which compares in sharp relief to the meaningless and oddly depressing random garbage/plagiarism that other people make with no greater forethought or ingenuity than a lump of old magazines being washed down a storm drain, then the message we share with each other is that artists might as well stop making art, because nothing they do is any better than the accidental crap that blights our urban environments through sheer chance and neglect.

And that’s a deeply soulless response to the artists of the world, who make massive sacrifices and sometimes even take mortal risks to send us the message “you matter…all is not lost…there is something divine within you that I will make you feel so you’ll know that it’s real, so you can burn with it joyously and triumphantly before the demonic machine of rampant global profiteering consumes the last of your warm blood from your heart, to fuel its mindless and hopeless march to nowhere.”


"The observer is the observed." - Jiddu Krishnamurti

reply

My question is why is this listed under genre: Documentary at IMDB when it is completely and utterly not.

reply

"My question is why is this listed under genre: Documentary at IMDB when it is completely and utterly not."

Actually, it is. A documentary, that is. It's real-life footage shaped to tell an interesting story.

reply

I will need to spend years and years studying this film before being able to form a credible opinion of it.

reporting back soon ..

reply

Just think in the real artists.

They spent years and years practising,getting better,seing things,drawing things,they putted a lot of effort into this,it's their dream,their hobby,their passion. And then comes this guy who knows *beep* about art.

Suddently he starts makings stickers and coloring pictures of Obama and other celebrities,drawing guitars....And there you go.Ladies and gentlemans we have an artist.He,in 1 year at max, turned himself into a bigger artist than Banksy like he stated at the beggining of the movie.Unbeliavable.

The french guy is not an artist.Like you said,he is a scam,an hyped scam but you gotta give to the man some props.He was very intelligent and capitalized his opportunity.He's making a lot of money and became well known by doing....Nothing?!I mean i can print an Obama pic and draw an yellow hair or something like that.

Really frustrating

reply

I don't think so, KBC I think MBW has passion to do art not to make money, I don't think MBW intentionally meant to exploit art, he just wanted to show the world about street art. You do know what they say, Copying somebody is a form of flattery there is no doubt in my mind that MBW had passion looking at his earlier works they were more acceptable and had more of his own style but even than it was obvious his style was based off of other famous street artists, but still had his own flair.

This guy who is filled with passion probably mistook the meaning behind the art or what originally Banksy, Invader and other street artists meant behind the artwork. They probably felt partially exploited though again it could be Jealousy, didn't Banksy and the other street artists sell their work? But maybe Banksy and the other street artists hated selling art, but they had to for money and for funds to produce more artwork. MBW was already rich, he didn't need to do it, he wanted to do it because he had passion, he worked extremely hard for what he wanted to do. Maybe Banksy was jealous he got famous too fast, which I think is true, his Art doesn't seem to have as much meaning as Banksy but than again there are no rules in Art. So I think it could partially be Jealousy.

Look at Ed Wood he sucked ass as a director but he had nothing but Passion. I don't think MBW did it for the money what so ever. I think MBW either mistook the meaning behind Art, or is just a really bad street artist and Banksy and the other artists felt exploited.

reply

"I mean i can print an Obama pic and draw an yellow hair or something like that. "

almost anyone can do that, anyone could put a lobster in place of a telephone handset, or make a messy bed with a load of dirty clothes on it, or take a shot from pulp fiction and replace guns with bananas, the fact is you didnt do that, someone else thought of it and did it first.

reply

Someone else did everything before MBW ..MBW paid people with real talent to copy what other people had thought of and did first...I believe he must have quite a few copyright infringement's going on ..

reply