Does anyone think this show has flaws when it comes to the liars?
It seems that each one of these characters are only three dimensional when we actually see them in their relationships with one another or their families but they seem all to fit into a stereotype that is very two dimensional.
Emily- Sporty
Aria- Artsy
Hanna-Girly
Spencer- Smart
It seems that these girls all have very similar personalities and even one of the cast members said the same thing when they were talking about their favorite show. I do not remember which one. They said that unlike "this show", Pretty Little Liars main characters personalities kind of blend together(sorry, I am not too articulate but hopefully, you guys understand) and they are not completely distinct. This show is too dependent on the stereotypes(which is what I am saying).
Hanna is the dumb blonde who loves fashion, actually ending up getting a career in it(let's not forget that her love for it more superficial than anything and is kind of insulting to anyone who actually is passionate about it) and because she is the "dumb" one, she is always the one who puts herself in danger and makes stupid decisions. I mean, Hanna is supposed to be ditsy, not actually stupid.
Aria is defined by her relationship with Ezra most of the time, so it is really hard to pin point. However, she far more pleasurable in the way she is presented because she is feminine and not different for the sake of being different, unlike characters similar to her in other shows. She is still similar personality wise to almost all the girls.
Emily is just sporty and not good in school, so she does not get in anywhere nor does she continue to go to college after her father passed away. Either way, she is literally used as lesbian decoration, instead of given something to do.
Spencer is apparently the only smart one that has common sense. However, there are people on the show smarter than her that is not the liar. She is just the smartest liar. It is still pretty insulting that she is the only one that has any use when it comes to A and is the only one that is considered smart at all. There is such a thing as people that are on top of their class but that does not make them intelligent on every level. Why not give every single girl common sense on certain areas or knowledge in some places that Spencer is not good in. Also, it is okay to diversify Spencer's personality a little bit. Instead of making her good at everything, she can be knocked down a peg because the other girls also have something to offer in intelligence. Look at Caleb. He was not a top student but he was smart because he had incredible common sense. Spencer was not always that way but since she is the "smart" one, she is the only one that is helpful.
Unlike the show Gossip Girl(I do think Pretty Little Liars has a lot of positives that the Gossip Girl does not), this show does not treat the main female characters like equals. Okay, so Serena gets everything she wants because of her looks and Blair has to work a little harder. However, Blair is still 100 times smarter and has a set career by the end while Serena has basically nothing, which shows her being a spoiled brat can not get her everything. Unlike Hanna, Serena grew up with an amazing education and was never really ditsy. She was getting bad grades but not because of lack of intelligence but because she was a troubled girl who never paid attention to where it counts. She was also not a schemer and was more naive, which is why she came off stupid(like actually stupid, not ditsy) most of the time. However, she actually made sense. The only thing that did not make sense is how the characters forgave her so easily. Sorry, off topic. Anyways, what I mean is Hanna is more like a caricature because she literally puts herself in danger not knowing that it is stupid, like why do the writers insist on making her look like that when she has had so many moments of common sense beyond the other people on the show. She is stupid when the writers want her to be and smart when they want her to be. It is like a split personality. It is also apparent a lot of the times that she is ditsy, not stupid while the writers seem to make her actually unintelligent in a lot of moments.
So my point is that one is that instead of them being distinct individuals with their own talents and smarts, they are all very similar unless the writers decide a different route for their character to only make one of them seem useful and adequate or the opposite.
Sorry for how long this is. I want to make sure I got all my points down.