MovieChat Forums > Man on a Ledge (2012) Discussion > Could be a spoiler but not intentionally

Could be a spoiler but not intentionally


Ed Harris. I like Ed Harris as he usually contributes well to a film often making it. But in this he was just there and actually anyone could have played his very unnoticeable part.Of course one could say ....there for the money but I think he has long passed that type of contribution.

In general the film easily carried itself and left me wondering why was Ed there? Good contribution by all other players but I feel, (SPOILER) these films are in danger of being classified as one would baked beans and instant coffee, and a block of one's favourite chocolate etc, nice and comfortable to have and almost a special buy, not quite.

reply

I think Ed suited this role due to his facial features. They stick our predominantly, and the slick-back hair style made him look like a sleazy, money-hungry tyrant - which is what his character was in this movie.

_________________________________
Steven Seagal Fan Club President

reply