MovieChat Forums > No Hard Feelings (2023) Discussion > Jennifer is only 32

Jennifer is only 32

posted a year ago by Mercy2000 (184)
9 replies | jump to latest

Too young to be a playing a cradle robber.

[–] JustSparks (111) a year ago

Her boobs looked at least 40.

[–] liscarkat (18541) a year ago

Boobs can still be excellent at forty, and certainly still are at thirty-two. However, I can understand how someone that age might seem elderly to a twelve-year-old.

[–] JustSparks (111) a year ago

I never called her elderly, or said boobs can't be excellent at forty, or said hers aren't excellent. I think they're quite nice, but its undeniable that they sag quite a bit for her age, especially considering they're on the smaller side.

[–] Luffy (1236) a year ago

Too young in most movie communities, except for the porn industry, and its fodder provider, Hollywood.

[–] BillySlater (4241) a year ago

She's age appropriate. 32 is old compared to 19.

[–] bobbydallas (8556) a year ago

true.
the high-schoolers would definitely spot her as "old"

[–] Volley (3433) a year ago

I looked up her age while watching, sure enough she’s 32.

On that note, decades ago when I was 19 I thought 24 was old. Now I’m late 30’s, don’t really feel old, but I think 50 is old. It isn’t that far away. Time flies.

[–] liscarkat (18541) a year ago

The guy was nineteen, an adult. No cradle robbing going on. All within legal and moral boundaries.

[–] TandyMan (11120) a year ago

32 is the new 55. Rode hard and put away wet.