MovieChat Forums > The Master (2012) Discussion > such a wonderful film but

such a wonderful film but


can somebody tell me if i really got the right interpretation:

none of what the master and his cult is basically real but it helped freddie at some point because he needed to believe in it just to fit in a post war society and to get over all his past traumas, freddie's passion for alcohool and womens won in the end, peggy was right from the begining about freddie being with them is something wrong, freddie has a major big problem that he can't accept the different opinions of the others and this cruel behaving toward the others is caused by fear, dodd's son didn't beleive his father but stayed with him just to survive and stay on the safe side of the life, hope and faith are better than searching questions and facts, did i get something wrong?

please explain to me the whole theme of another life and the dream freddie's had in the end and if there was something homosexual in the master's behavior in the end and if freddie is repeating question while sleeping with the english woman ironically? are we supposed to beleive something specific in the end or just what we like to beleive?

reply

[deleted]

In case what you are saying is true, the main character didn't believe in anything the master did, in an ironic way Joaquin's character was the master of his life

reply

[deleted]

I think The Master is earnestly trying to help humanity, but it's a lonely place to be at the top and not have all of the answers -- especially when everybody's looking to you for answers.

In the end, he didn't have the right answers for Freddie, which is why Freddie left. I interpret the end of the movie as Freddie embracing the axiom "free winds and no tyranny," doing whatever he pleases without a master telling him what to do.

reply

that's what i understood in the end,that Freddie can control his life without a master and that Dodd was very wise but in contrast he didn't had all the answers about humanity and life

reply

Can control his life?

After he left Master, he headed straight to the pub, got wasted and seduced a woman. He couldn't control his life, just like Master had said:

If you figure a way to live without serving a master, any master, then let the rest of us know, will you? For you'd be the first person in the history of the world.

What I think Master was implying in that final encounter was that The Cause/Dianetics was made up, he didn't have the answers and although he kind of hoped that Fredd could stay, he knew he had to go as he could not be cured. Furthermore, Master himself was losing his way. He probably had been like Fredd, someone without a direction and with lots of problems, before he founded The Cause. But while he was temporarily cured by the new direction in his life, he was sliding back into alcoholism, melancholy and depression as years went by.

Also, Master also had to serve some other master. On the other hand, his wife was his master, having considerable power in The Cause. On the other hand, maybe Fredd was his master too. Originally, he probably was trying to exploit Fredd because curing such a miserable person would prove that Dianetics work. But then he came to identify with Fredd, whose background could have been similar to his. He genuinely liked him and longed for him after he moved to England.

So, to summarize everything
, I though that the message, if you could say so, of this film was very pessimistic. We try to live an authentic, free life, be our own masters. In reality, our existence is always unauthentic in one way or other: Either we literally serve other masters, religious leaders, politicians, our employers and abstract things such as money, ideologies, markets, society, or then we could be free in principle, but without any real control on our own lives because we lack all the powers one can gain by serving a master.

reply