This makes no sense to me. How on earth does a brunette look more slutty (I assume that's what they mean by oversexed?) than a blonde? Because blondes are usually the ones shown as sluts on tv and in movies?
shareHer character wasn't supposed to be the stereotypical naive dumb blonde slut, but rather the stereotypical sly, calculating and domineering oversexed power-hungry bitch; see for example Demi Moore in Disclosure (1994) or Linda Fiorentino in The Last Seduction (1994).
Moreover, with blonde hair Aniston reminds us too much of the angelic Rachel from "Friends".
______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
https://y2u.be/VI57QHL6ge0
This makes sense. Ugh, I find it ridiculous that even the color of your hair comes down to a stereotype. Thank you for the answer. You're right, people would probably connect her with Friends; there would be posts on here "Rachel is a slut!"
shareMaybe brunettes have more fun.
Its that man again!!
Newsflash this bitch is not a real blonde....
shareDude get a girl finally and figure that out yourself.
shareShe was ash brunette, which is one of the lighter shades if that makes a difference.
It was a nice look for her and she seemed to revel in the role, playing somebody other than the Rachel-ish roles she has played which have mostly followed her into the movies. Even as a stripper in "We're the Millers" she was still a Rachel-ish character.
This was very different for her and it was fun to watch her, especially in the practically nude scene in her office.
idk but she was the only thing decent about this film.
shareIt worked.
share