I've never been the type to say "who cares if they adapt this? Who cares if the make a sequel to that?" but I walked 10 miles in the Las Vegas summer to by this game before I even had a console to play it on. I used to play the GTAs all day every day and kill this person and that. But this game is different. I don't do that. Rockstar really raised the bar with this game and to make a movie out of it seems pointless. I'd rather see an epic Pacman movie. I'm not like obsessed about the game but it is my favorite, next to Crash Bandicoot 2 maybe. And I'm sure it's many peoples favorite.
Just when I thought this game was too old to attract retarded trolls with latent homosexual tendencies (which they try to hide by calling others gay), I come here and see this.
I agree with the OP, I don't really want to see a movie of this. However, perhaps a 'prequel' movie or mini-series MAY have potential. Imagine it done right, like Deadwood, about John's time in the gang. That could be pretty impressive. I'd like to see it finish just before the game starts. Perhaps even animated, like they did with Dead Space between the two games.
Actually I'm pretty sure the only reason a movie wouldn't work is because the game is so engaging. You're allowed to take the story at your own pace, and on top of this; it kind of feeds you information slow-burn, little by little, until you get the point. I'm not saying movies can't do that. But if you take a look at the important points of the story, and condense them down, to about two and a half hours. What you'd get is a pretty standard Hollywood western revenge/tragedy. I can't think of a single unique thing about it.
I've said the same thing about Heavy Rain. For a game, it's pretty daring, and is engaging because it's interactive, but if it was a movie - no matter what the choices you made, audiences are pretty likely to see them all coming. It didn't surprise me then, when I heard David Cage had hired screenwriters to help him flesh out the possibilities in the story's timeline. It's a pretty standard thriller. It wasn't exactly Oldboy or anything.
Then again, if you can capture the tone that Red Dead had, this feeling that everything is hopeless, and violence is (mostly) just a desperate, pitiful attempt to postpone your own mortality - if it could get that across - somehow - it might register with some as a valid piece of art.
I guess where I'm going is the notion that the things making games like Red Dead great, are subtle, between the lines moments, that movies usually don't have the time for - not in these types of stories. If a screenwriter takes what 'he needs' as a screenwriter, and discards the rest, what he's going to end up with is "Government forces John Marston to kill his friends John dies in the process, son takes revenge; the end.
I do like the idea of a prequel, but only in animated form, and I think John could look especially cool in some ink.
---- You can't know what you're talking about if you don't know what you're saying.
I'm going to agree on that they shouldn't make a movie out of this. For one thing, Westerns don't tend to sell that well anymore and I can't imagine a producer wanting to risk it as the majority of people (aside from gamers) won't really know what it's about or be that into it.
As Bioparadoxous has mentioned, the story in itself is not that unique and has been around before.
I do, however, see this working as a maybe a two or three season show on something like HBO.
On a side note, a prequel in a game format I wouldn't be that into. I'd like to see Jack Marston's story told. Something where he finds love, where he learns that his father was also a hero and not just a gun slinger, where he too can rise above all things and be a better man.
After GTA IV, RDR and LA Noire - something...with a happy ending wouldn't be all that bad.
-------------------------------------- Deftones makes the world a better place
For one thing, Westerns don't tend to sell that well anymore and I can't imagine a producer wanting to risk it as the majority of people (aside from gamers) won't really know what it's about or be that into it.
Tell that to the producers behind True Grit. Further, this is a franchise with an established fan base. It's not like it's some completely new work of fiction.
As Bioparadoxous has mentioned, the story in itself is not that unique and has been around before.
So has pretty well every plot you've seen on film since it's inception. The major plots were all done to death before film was even invented.
On a side note, a prequel in a game format I wouldn't be that into. I'd like to see Jack Marston's story told. Something where he finds love, where he learns that his father was also a hero and not just a gun slinger, where he too can rise above all things and be a better man.
Personally I would hope any sequel would focus on a completely different person\family. Much like the GTA games which are only very loosely connected to each other. They take place in the same universe, but focus on completely different groups of people.
After GTA IV, RDR and LA Noire - something...with a happy ending wouldn't be all that bad.
Rockstar is pretty big on dark stories, and light happy endings don't usually work in those kinds of stories. I mean, would it really make sense to tag a happy ending on LA Noire(especially considering noir typically ends badly for the protagonist)? I wouldn't mind bitter sweet, but a happy ending wouldn't really fit in any of the games they've put out previously.
Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!
reply share
I can agree with the OP on this for one specific reason--you can play the game in different ways, "good" guy or "bad" guy, differing order, etc. A movie would choose a stance and a throughline, and that would ruin the experience we've all had.