MovieChat Forums > Cedar Rapids (2011) Discussion > This story was genius. (from a conventio...

This story was genius. (from a convention-goer)


I can understand how some people didn't enjoy this movie. Not to be snobby and elitist about 'taste', but I think one has to have a particular world view to appreciate the humor in the plot and dialogue.

And not to stereotype, but I wonder how many die-hard posters on IMDB boards have actually ever participated in one of these types of conventions. It really is an alternate-reality. Now I by no means attend every convention of every industry, but I work in a fairly conservative and well-respective field, most of my colleagues are late 20's-early 60's. When they are annual things like in this story, people really do have 'convention alter egos', be-it cheating on their spouse, playing the "that guy" that everyone kinda feels sorry for but some want to hang out with just out of curiosity or loyalty, or any sort of persona you can live out for a week among people you know are probably only as cool as you are as well.

Also, even in conservative circles, the booze usually flows like water, which I think tends to magnify the lack of inhibitions. I know I've done crap at conventions I probably can't pull of in my own town, but the sense of transience and a year to get past the consequences is really too much for people who were probably a bit crazy in college but had to button down to enter the professional world to not take advantage of the "what happens in blank, stays in blank" mantra.

Ed Helms and John C. Riley are a great pair, and I think Stephen Root gets too little credit. I especially love the little physical nuances all three bring, from Riley's little shuffle onto the gay wedding dance floor to Root's pictures with his daughter. I don't know.

I also love the premise of the stunted man-child Helms plays. I know a few people like this, and also grew up in a small town where you sometimes have that doe-eyed naivete when you travel to the 'big city'. Watching his character evolved from someone who believes in promise rings for their *beep* buddy and that people who are found dead with their pants down and a belt around their neck had an 'accident' was a fun ride.

Maybe I could just relate to this film too much not for me to absolutely think it was hilarious. I tend to hang out with/be part of 'that crowd' that others think are just a joke, or who get dirty looks from organizers or people trying to 'get something out of it', but really it's all just sort of a joke. Most of the business of these events could be done via email or conference call. They really are a social gathering, and some of us socialize differently than others I suppose.

Either way, over all I thought this is probably one of the best and under-spoken pictures I've seen in years. People who disagree have that right, but really, watch it a few times and you'll see the endearing qualities it possesses.

reply

It seemed pretty realistic in bits, haha!

New Releases and Old Favorites!: blurayrankings.com

reply

Yeah, I agree. I've done both the national/regional sales meeting setting (which this was more like) and the sales convention type of gatherings where we were working a display booth and meeting customers and prospects.

The film does a great job of showing how such gathering take place almost completely within a hotel or hotel and convention center and you never get outside and don't see much of the city you are gathered at. And when the alcohol flows, weird things start to happen.

I also liked how they filmmaker brought in the whole 'team building exercises' that usuall are a part of the sales meetings. Really contrived and stupid, but then some people get taken over by the competitiveness of winning some small trinket.

I could feel a real 'Alexander Payne' influence on this film and there he was in the credits as one of the producers. Not as well executed as 'Sideways' or 'About Schmidt' in terms of the story, but the performances of the actors were very well done and rich in understatement and subtlety which are real hallmarks of Payne's work. I know he didn't direct but I could feel his influence just the same. I wonder if the director is a protege of his.



Let's never come here again because it would never be as much fun.

reply