MovieChat Forums > The Next Three Days (2010) Discussion > Most overrated film ever? Or just in th...

Most overrated film ever? Or just in the last decade?


Yeah, I know we "have to" like this film simply because it's Paul Haggis, but really, come on.

One day Russell is a mild-mannered community college professor, and within a short time, he's not only an expert marksman, but a marksman who can go into a drug dealer's home and kill a bunch of bad guys. He's also become a master thief and locksmith. Automobile or office building...you name it, and Russell can break in. Oh, and how easily he got a fake passport and other IDs. Not to mention his driving skills to outshine a thousand trained officers of the Pitt P.D. Need money to live off of in South American the rest of your life? Why, simply go out and rob your local drug dealer, his gang, and his guard dog! In addition, don't forget to learn how to forge medical records to fool a competent doctor.

Oh, and the best part? He got the plan to acquire all these skills after a 4-minute discussion with an ex-con in a bar. Talk to a total stranger for 4 minutes, and you know all you need to know.

This was among the most unrealistic movies of all time.


It's hard to get into it from the beginning. You can't start the film with Banks getting arrested, with no back story, us not seeing the crime, no knowledge about her life with Russell, etc.

Why did Russell try so hard to free her? It because he loves her of course, but we have to guess this. There's nothing to establish this. We don't know if she's a murderer, a good mom, a terrible wife, etc.

I guess we're also supposed to think that Russell is a great dad, but all he ever does is drop the kid off at someone else's house (his parents, Olivia Wilde's, etc.) while he commits his various felonies....including letting his son watch him break into a medical van. Great dad.

reply

Sure. Steven Seagal movies must be among the most realistic for you. Or perhaps Chuck Norris movies.

The idea of killing those drug dealers was pretty good actually, and it's not that hard to do just that. You have to keep in mind that he was no longer a "mild-mannered teacher" but someone very desperate and determined to rescue his wife.

That "ex-con" just gave him some info and some ideas, the actual planning took pretty long. Yeah, the beginning of the movies wasn't that good but it got better and better afterwards.

reply

The characters that are played by Seagal and Norris are usually ex-military who devoted their entire life to gunfights and survival. That's a lot different than a teacher picking up those skills in 20 minutes.

reply

Nothing suggests that he picked up "those skills" in 20 minutes or even a few days, it's just your assumption. There lots of non-military people who are good shooters because they like guns. And there wasn't really much skill involved.

reply

yep steven segal killing 45 people in one movie with out a scratch, much more convincing...

reply

im not so sure this film was rated that highly by the masses for it to be even classed as overrated in the first place.

overated? thats term is referred to huge films such as The Avengers, Disney's Frozen, Pirates of the Carribean series and Avatar etc... or Oscar sweeping award winning films such as Crash and The Hurt Locker

reply

I think this film is actually underrated. The film Paul Haggis got famous for, 'Crash', is actually the overrated one.

reply

I don't remember the timeline, but the movie takes place around 3 years, not really a "short time".
Why am I Mr. Pink?

reply

[deleted]