I don't see why they should all have to wear bikini's
Ummm, because it is called, "Bikini's" and their kitsch is having good looking women walking around in bikini tops so guys can see their breasts jiggling around.
it just depends on what is on her contract
What contract? Those workers as "At-Will" employees, meaning they can be fired for most any reason and can quit whenever they want without any consequences other than loss of benefits.
I'm not convinced that being filmed for a reality show is a part of that,
She could have refused to be part of it. In addition, it isn't any kind of unreasonable request - no different than if a news crew was there covering crowd reaction to a big sporting event.
some of the women featured had their faces blurred out if I recall.
I don't remember anyone having their faces blurred. I do remember some of the pictures and brands being blurred out.
There's some wiggle room in there for a legal debate
She didn't have a contract and isn't in a union.
if someone were to make that an even bigger case over regulating what can be considered a "uniform" in the workplace before it gets considered "sexual harassment".
Since women working in strip clubs have no legal standing for their "uniforms" to be considered "sexual harassment" the women at bikini's have none either. In addition, it is highly unlikely that the management allows any real sexual harassment of their 'babes' by their 'fans.'
Hooters waitresses will lean forward on to a table with their forearms and use their upper arms to push their breasts together to show more cleavage - thus making better tips. And I've seen guys get run out of Hooters before because they've gotten grabby. The best they can hope for is they get out of there before the cops show up.
How can one possibly compare Hooters to this restaurant chain!?". This place makes Hooters look like a church!
You must be going to a Hooters in a Muslim country. When I go, I'm surprised if a girl has shorts which cover her entire tush. And there usually is at least one waitress who uses her cleavage as a pen holder.
With regards to this bartender, she should have been fired on the spot for serving the guy who was way drunk. While I think the law is complete and utter bullsh!t, it is the law and she allowed him to get way too drunk (skipping the part how the show is fake to begin with)
I think the CEO could have changed the order in which he said things when he fired her. He could have said that he understands she is not looking at this as a long-term job, so he's going to make some calls to try to find her something more to her liking. In the mean time, give her a month's severance pay and tell her she is no longer working for him.
Of course, the way he said it was more dramatic and made for "better TV", so that is why it was done how it was.
reply
share