Boring


I never cared and was relieved when it ended so I could wake up and do something enjoyable.

reply

And something meaningful, like telling the millions of people who don't care that you didn't like a movie?

reply

Probably the same millions of people also dont care about your opinion of another person opinion.
this is a movie forum. If you dont like to read people's opinions about movies, just dont enter to them.

reply

Well, actually, I do have a few million people who do care about my opinions, but that's just a lucky fact of my occupation. I don't mind reading other people's opinions, but I like opinions of substance, rather than "I was bored. I didn't like it." Any idiot can have an opinion like that. I read these boards on occasion in hopes of finding intelligent discussion, not inchoate dismissal. Any pinhead can pop a balloon.

reply

Any pinhead can pop a balloon.
Sad, isn't it? And many are eager to show just how quickly they can dismiss a movie like The American, that makes the grievous error of assuming that a viewer has a modicum of intelligence and patience, with a single word.

It's been over two years since I last saw The American, but (like others on this board) I find I'm unable to forget it. Really a bewitching little movie, but you've got to give it your full attention.

Many of these complaints are a bit like griping that meditation didn't do anything for you, yet you spent the entire time trying to glance at your iPhone. I mean, watch the movie or don't watch it, but it shouldn't be background noise.

Last night I sought out Corbijn's Control, having been so impressed with this and his most recent venture, A Most Wanted Man. He's really quite a confident and singular filmmaker, and he's got a terrific eye.

Glad to see you about, Mr. Beaver.

reply

Bravo to you both.

The ability to substantiate one's opinion is always where the "rubber meets the road."
If this wasn't a requirement for a legitimate opinion, why then would we take anyone's word for anything?

Snarky comments are one thing but the ability to actually bring pith is another entirely.
If someone can't even submit a cursory effort toward that end, what Asimov said ultimately rings true;

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”

reply

Agreed.

Ignorance isn't bliss. Ignorance is laziness. So stop being so lazy!

reply

You got told by Whitney Ellsworth, you hooplehead!

reply

[deleted]

"Too often we... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
- John F. Kennedy

reply

Then go watch a movie with more explosions and guns. Or maybe a cartoon.

It's a character study, not an action flick. Apparently you cared enough to come here and fill the discussion boards with unintelligent crap.

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2339870/

reply

There was action in it but that doesnt make a movie exciting, i found the character study boring. Extended closeups of george cloony trying to be dramatic just dont cut it for me i guess.

reply

I have to agree with you. I think this movie is a good example of how easy it is to deceive audiences into mistaking style for substance. Yes, by the standards of a generation raised on music videos, it's a "character study". But I'd rather spend my time and money on character studies that are defined by the dialog, not the cinematography and facial expressions.

And for anyone who might suggest otherwise: No, I am NOT into action movies.


Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers! But if you could show us something in a nice possum...

reply

I have to agree with you. I think this movie is a good example of how easy it is to deceive audiences into mistaking style for substance.
As I sheepishly put my hand up... I watched this on a whim and was impressed.

...on character studies that are defined by the dialog, not the cinematography and facial expressions.
well, sometimes a story can be well told without too much dialogue. Like The American.

Anyway. I enjoyed the movie (whether I actually enjoyed it, or was deceived into thinking I was enjoying it is a philosophical question I'll ponder tonight). It was something that didn't just lay out exposition on a platter and left quite a good many questions unanswered. I liked that. After my second viewing with the director's commentary, I have a greater appreciation for the movie.

And, hey, I like action movies... well, good ones at any rate.

reply

No, judging by the content of your post, I wouldn't have guessed that you were into action movies. I wouldn't even judge you if you were unless you exhibited a particular brand of obtuseness that seems to be the common denominator of attention challenged viewers.

There is extreme subtlety and at times, not so subtlety in this movie. If you didn't find this to be a very engaging, "character study," then I'm afraid that you most probably missed the more nuanced facets of the movie. Perhaps it's because you have a very regimented notion of what makes for "proper" character development and revelation but in my opinion, the broader the array of vehicles utilized by a movie in order to illustrate moods, circumstances, emotions and of course, character, the more closely that the film imitates life.

Real intent and disposition is so often revealed in the non-verbal cues of people. It is the savvy viewer, not to mention, savvy citizen who is attuned to such nuance.

The scenery shots are there for the depth and beauty that we all can appreciate in our own lives and which are ubiquitously present in this particular movie and in just that capacity.

reply

No, judging by the content of your post, I wouldn't have guessed that you were into action movies. I wouldn't even judge you if you were unless you exhibited a particular brand of obtuseness that seems to be the common denominator of attention challenged viewers.

There is extreme subtlety and at times, not so subtle events in this movie. If you didn't find this to be a very engaging, "character study," then I'm afraid that you most probably missed the more nuanced facets of the movie. Perhaps it's because you have a very regimented notion of what makes for "proper" character development and revelation but in my opinion, the broader the array of vehicles utilized by a movie in order to illustrate moods, circumstances, emotions and of course, character, the more closely that the film imitates life.

Real intent and disposition is so often revealed in the non-verbal cues of people. It is the savvy viewer, not to mention, savvy citizen who is attuned to such nuance.

The scenery shots are there for the depth and beauty that we all can appreciate in our own lives and which are ubiquitously present in this particular movie and in just that capacity.

reply

What character study? He never did anything to show who he was, why he did what he did, why he killed the first girl. I would have turned it off but husband wanted to finish it in case something happened. Just a butterfly in the tree as he died. Boring.

reply

I do agree. It has nothing to do with character study. The film is boring with a loose scenario, leaving a lot to the fantasy.

reply

What character study? He never did anything to show who he was, why he did what he did, why he killed the first girl.

Good questions. I saw a guy who was happy with a woman, but when things went south and there was going to be a lot of difficult questions; questions and the fact that he was not as safe as he thought he was, he killed her.

I'd go on with his attempts to move on with his life after that, but you saw it, and my interpretation would not help change your view or opinion of the movie, so I won't waste yours or my time.

And why are some many people fixated on 'knowing' everything? "why did he do that?" "Why did he kill his girlfriend?" "Who are those Swedes, and why are they trying to kill him?" "How come his boss is trying to kill him, now?" "Why can't I get a good discount with my power company?"

If a movie is engaging enough, I don't need to know the ins and outs of every single piece and character. If you want to know and understand everything, from go to wo, watch... I don't know; something more obvious.

It's one of those things. At least you can say you saw it. Boring or not.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

NO action!!!

"Peace and love"

reply

Agreed. It was terrible, incredibly boring. i was also glad when it was over, tbh i felt nothing for any of the charaters, weak plot with no interesting turn. The only merley good part was when the italian girl was naked.

1/10

reply

I can't stand George Clooney- he's an awful person, and not that good of an actor.

I liked this movie- it played out like a Greek Tragedy- and that's what did it for me. It was very slow and methodical in its telling. It made you feel for an awful man.

reply

Why is Clooney an awful person? Care to say why?

"Remember, you have to make it home to get paid" (The Dogs of War)

reply

Well, he's just so far left leaning that it makes me nauseous. Its not just his political affiliation, its his smug and arrogant attitude that really does it. He's one of those "You can have any opinion you like, as long as it's the same as mine" types.

reply

[deleted]

You hate Clooney for his politics?

You hate truth?

Maybe you hate justice?

Perhaps it is freedom and democracy you hate ....

Or is it that you would rather be lied to, ripped off, and taken for an easily scammed uneducated sucker by the right wing?

I would bet you watch Fox News and actually believe what they say.

Get the facts, get informed, get real.


reply

[deleted]

Well, he's just so far left leaning that it makes me nauseous. Its not just his political affiliation, its his smug and arrogant attitude that really does it.


I see. What about his acting? Isn't that really what we should be talking about here? And if you don't like left-leaning actors, then you are probably not going to like most of them.

By the way, everyone who works with him seems to love him. Maybe it's your own politics that are the problem, not the actor's.

reply

I can't stand George Clooney- he's an awful person
would it be okay if you put that into context? I've never met the man; can you tell me why he is an awful person? I'm happy that you don't like him, but when one says someone is 'awful', "I's gots to know."

Oops. I should have kept reading before posting. I'll read your other stuff and be satisfied with that. Thanks for listening, though.

Well, he's just so far left leaning that it makes me nauseous.
So that makes him awful.

Its not just his political affiliation, its his smug and arrogant attitude that really does it.
Ah, now I'm with you. Arrogant = Awful person.

He's one of those "You can have any opinion you like, as long as it's the same as mine" types.
Yep. Thanks for that. George Clooney is an awful person. Fancy being that arrogant.

reply

[deleted]

I gotta agree, this thing could not have been more dry or dull or uneventful. Really boring, pointless movie.

reply

Agree. The movie not only failed as an action movie (understandable), but as a character study or as an allegory. The lack of explanation (who are the Swedes? Why do they want Clooney dead? Why does his handler want him dead? What drives him to be an assassin? etc.) turned this into a terrible boring movie. Interesting thing here is according to Rotten Tomatoes critics generally loved it while audience generally hate it. That tells me a lot.

reply

The lack of explanation (who are the Swedes?
George's character may know this, but why do we need to know?

Why do they want Clooney dead?
Maybe George doesn't know either. Why do we need to know?

Why does his handler want him dead?
You sound like my mum. "Psst. Why did he do that? I thought they were on the same side. Why did he do that?" Sometimes we don't get to know. Ever.

reply

OP's the boring one.

reply

[deleted]