The only problem with that is the perceived notion of what would happen in an alternate/parallel universe should probably be based on reality. The further you stray from what does happen in real life the more the narrative lacks believability.
I would say it depends on how well it's handled. If things are simply changed for the sake of change with little critical basis for the change provided then it can come across as forced and thus create a believably issue. However, there's a point wherein the fantasy elements can become so pronounced that it's unbelievable for things not to change.
For example, an issue I have with comics pertains to banks. Some destructive super powered individual seems to rob or attempt to rob one every week. Why then do these institutions still exist? Obviously the answer is that it's not something that writers thought of too deeply and/or it's being ignored for the sake of providing a familiar and easy source of conflict. However, in my mind, that sort of massive security issue would prompt governments to switch to entirely electronic currency and the impact of that is something that can be explored in a way that elevates the story, rather than detracts from it. Maybe it doesn't work. Maybe it throws the world economy into chaos either because the shift is too abrupt or because there are powers that allow for the easy manipulation of electronic currency. In which case, there should be even more changes to society to the point where it may not be entirely recognizable.
The end result of all that may be something too divergent from modern society for select personal tastes (not everyone likes fantasy worlds and that's fine). Someone may prefer something like the original Spider-man trilogy where the world is largely the same except for the fact that a handful of people have superpowers. However, I don't think you can get that from a concept like the one that X-men has. The ramifications of there being millions of super powered people living among a majority powerless population is something that can't not seriously impact society and thus the attempt to portray that is something that I think is necessary in order to maintain believably.
Sure, immortal superheroes with blades on their hands is a stretch but a race of Amazon women does have some sort of basis in fact. The changes in the last 100 years have been incredible. Can you imagine female cage fighters in Edwardian times? Female soldiers at the Somme? So who's to say what might happen in the future.
There's no evidence that there was a "race" of Amazons but it is based in fact in the sense that there have always been individual women who bucked tradition and donned the warrior role in society and also that the Greeks had contact with nomadic people where women warriors were an accepted part of society.
Unfortunately, in medieval society these depictions of women warriors were not often glorified in the same sense that figures like Athena was in Greco-Roman society. Rather, they were regularly demonized in order to send a societal message that following in their footsteps was bad. Thus they were depicted in terms that could have been considered very "un-womanly" and "hideous" even while their actions often led to their doom. "Beowulf" is an example of that.
In any case, this is kind of my point. Societal changes happen in interesting ways. Thus, just as we can imagine a fictional fantasy medieval setting wherein women warriors are common because of our knowledge of women warriors at various points in history, we can imagine a fictional "near future" where the existence of mutants have influenced things like gun laws. The reason being that fear driven responses to changes in gun laws is not new to us. It may be "new" to a certain part of the world but if it can happen in one place it can happen in another and thus I would say that this sort of thing also has a basis in fact and thus is not a stretch.
My only issue with "female warriors in medieval fantasy" is when they continually get naked for no reason, like in GoT. Sort of ruined the whole series for me.
Agreed. There's no question that they're often handled poorly in terms of their physical portrayals. Unfortunately, they often exist less to empower and more to be salacious. Hence, also, the absurd "armor" that they often wear in a lot of pop fantasy, which would offer them no real world protection.
That perhaps adds to the issue certain people seem to have with their existence. If they're not treated seriously then it can be difficult to take them seriously, thus contributing to the believably of their existence within that setting. However, there are some very good depictions out there. I actually think "A Song of Ice and Fire" provides a very solid example of one in Brienne of Tarth. However, I have only read the books so I don't know how well her character has been adapted to "Game of Thrones." Supposedly there's a lot more senseless nudity in the show than in the books from what a friend of mine who got disgusted with the show for that reason told me. She is also not a fan of fantasy women with non-functional sexualized armor and what she refers to as "excessive" breast size.
reply
share