MovieChat Forums > Allen v. Farrow (2021) Discussion > Allen V. Farrow so obviously stupid and ...

Allen V. Farrow so obviously stupid and biased ... somebody needs to get sued to end this harassment


As much as it irritates me I am watching this stupid and getting worse fake-u-mentary about the Woody Allen child molestation case. The more I watch the worse it gets and the less I believe even one scintilla of the slander and charges being leveled at Woody.

Tonight's S1 ( are there going to be more seasons of this awful Farrow revenge fantasy? ) Episode 3 begins by talking about how Woody Allen donates his notes and papers, as one of the primary American film artists to Princeton University for historic reasons. This series seems to pour through all these papers looking for anything that contains scenes or themes about young women and selecting them and pulling them out and even showing them on the screen as if they are all written together.

One line appears and the screen, and then is backspaced to write another line. It is so dishonest and ridiculous. Whose mind is so vicious as to think this up and then put to video equating writing stories about young/younger women - like 90% of all movies ever made or considered have in them, but in Woody's care trying to twist that into proof that Woody is a child molester?

A young woman is not a 7 year old child. A movie is not reality. In a movie there is a certain edge to a larger age gap that plays, or at least used to play well with getting men into theaters on date night to sell tickets. It is a little better these days after scads of movies starring doddering old actors like Sean Connery matched with practically teenage women.

But one of the most creepy movies I ever started to watch that I think was horrible about young children was the violence in "The Adventures of SharkBoy and LavaGirl".

But back to Allen V. Farrow, I see 5/5 reviews on Amazon where people are soaking this nonsense up like a QANON or PizzaGate conspiracy. Why are these people so gullible and uncritical?

reply