If they want to change the essence of the title character, change the way he operates, change the environment in which he works, change how he relates to weapons, change the secondary characters that are around him and make up his universe--then don't call it MacGyver. Make it a whole new show with a new name.
to the last part, I don't particularly disagree. But is there a standard as to who much of something has to relate to the original material before it can be called a reboot? Like others have mentioned, a lot of the change is a product of the time change. It's 2016. How many people do you know now who act like people did in the 80's? How many things can we do now to handle situations like we did in the 80's.
Everything and everyone operates differently now. MacGyver from the 80's couldn't stop crap without a hacker in 2016.
I do get where you're coming from though, but I think it's more a matter of approach than anything else. I think a compromise would have worked. Like say a NEW show that ties into the original MacGyver. It would have been better served to have the titular character in this show be Mac's son or grandson. Have him share a lot of characteristics his father/grandfather had. Have him been taught his skills by the original MacGyver. Then he could be his own man while still sharing similarities. In fact, as I watch MacGyver, that's honestly how I imagine it.
I'm so hip I have trouble seeing over my pelvis.
reply
share