Okay so you've thought this out pretty throughly. Do you think the end was real or not real?
Even though I don't think even Christipher Nolan knows whether it was reality or not. He wanted ambiguity at the end. Wanted to make people think about it and they FORM their own speculation. Both sides of the argument have evidence. It's just based on your perspective.
I don't think it was ambiguous, I think it just didn't explain in an obvious way, it was let for us to try to figure it out.
I provided evidences on why the end wasn't real, and it seems coherent.
Rewatching the movie, I see that when he tried to extract from Saito, when Saito wakes up they are already gone. That's the proper way of doing it, when the subject wakes up he doesn't see them and thinks it was a very odd dream. In time, the dream vanishes from memory and he never thinks of it again.
But when they wake up from Fischer, Fischer sees them both inside the plane and on the airport. Wouldn't he feel it odd to have a so complex dream with real people he never met before? Of course they'd have attacked him. Even the part about Peter being kidnapped and tortured would mean anything, since it was just a dream.
Also, once they wake up, nothing else makes sense or matters. Things just "work out", as in a perfect way, as if controlled. Saito could use ways to free Cobb, but not with just a simple call and solve it in a few minutes. And while Cobb walks in the airport, he sees everybody there, but they look like remembrances, not real people. Nobody talked to him, Ariadne specially would not just let him leave without going talk about the whole experience. It was as if they were being shown to him but weren't gonna get in the way.
When Cobb is ported from the airport to the house, he thinks it's odd. Dreams are full of odd things and we never question them, but Cobb was trained and did it. Then he tried the top. Mal's father was there guiding him, but once he goes meet his children, the father just conveniently leaves. Look at his face, how it shows an expression of mission accomplished, of satisfaction. Don't get in the way, now just leave Cobb with his children, living with them forever.
It all looked like a dream.
Also the totem isn't really effective IMO. He says to never show anyone your totem. After Ariadne said no about her bishop, he tells HER exactly what his/Mal's does. And she was the one who built all the levels. So that totem can't be used as a verification anymore and also it was Mal's not his.
Indeed... I see that Aradne takes on the movie the role of the expectator that is unable to understand what's happening. The movie plot is very complex and paces fast. Some ppl would be unable to understand and get lost and annoyed. In the scenes that would happen, Ariadne comes showing she's annoyed too, making questions, or receiving explanations. Maybe it's just a plot hole, the role of the totem is explained to her and it's explained how Cobb's totem works. That explanation is aimed to us, so we later understand when we see it working. She's used as a way for explaining to us, but she shouldn't receive that explanation in-movie.
But anyway, I used to think it was real at the end then I saw/heard some other evidence for the non reality side so then I started to say it wasn't real at the end. Also some people (not as many as the other 2 sides) say that the whole movie was a dream based off of the movie starting in the middle of a dream without us knowing how it was started, and the whole Mal and Cobb going up "1 layer" of dreaming. We don't know if they used a sedative or "died" in the previous layers. And that was all in the past. Mal could've been right the whole time and the movie was all a dream. So who knows??
Very interesting! Yes, it could all be a dream, and Mal be right. But it's somehow proven that she was a projection. If she was right, she'd need to be a person inside the dream, trying to reach Cobb to warn him. She'd not just let it go and die.
Also, the movie wouldn't be clever if it was all just a dream. The introduction scene was just the future, a common plot strategy to start the story from the end, to then come back to it and complete it. It wasn't the begining, not in the past.
The whole idea of it being a dream comes from the top spinning at the end. If it wasn't that scene, the others I pointed wouldn't be enough to believe it was a dream, and it would all be reality. So, for the whole devate to exist, we must have the presupposition that the top works. Therefore, when it's shown falling, it must be real; when it's shown stable, it's a dream.
==============
I'll rewatch the movie again and pay more attention to his tests. He does 2 or 3 during the movie. I believe in the last one the top doesn't spin, it just falls on the ground. That would be the ambiguous part: it could be reality and the top just felt, or it could already be a dream and whoever was in charge made it fall so Cobb wouldn't test it.
Based on that, yes, part of the movie was reality. I'll try to find the exact moment when the dream starts. I question if the whole team was inside the dream, or if they are shown in real scenes.
Ariadne for sure is against Cobb. She's the one that targets him, gets his trust, and learns everything about him. She was introduced to him by Mal's father, who's also in the ending scene, so he's the obvious suspect of plotting against Cobb. But why would he do that? He'd not try to lock Cobb just to get rid of him, so Cobb stops phoning his grandchildren. Maybe vengeance for killing Mal? Or maybe it's not him, maybe it's somebody else passing as him, but in that case the dream would have to start much earlier and the totem test would be invalidated.
Also, the team wasn't trustworthy. With exception of Arthur, all the others were recently introduced to Cobb or he hadn't worked with them enough. They could pretty much be betraying him.
reply
share