so the male porn star guy??
did three scenes in one day??
shareWhat's your issue with that?
sharea certain effect would be lost.
shareNah, just gotta stay hydrated.
shareNot when you're young and full of testosterone. 🤷♀️🤷♀️
sharei think you misunderstand the effect i was referring to.
shareWhat would that be? Semen?
sharethat's what people tell me. 😊
shareWell then I still stand by what I said lol. Youth + testosterone = lots of virility and semen. I was with a guy that went four times in 3 hours and he had plenty to go around each time. 😁😁😁😁
shareYou shouldn't be bragging that you're a very promiscuous woman. There are kids reading these boards
shareYour cumshot ís gonna be less impressive second and third time in the same day, even when you're young and fit.
sharehe drinks a lot of OJ
shareWell the plan was two scenes, the third one sort of just happened. but yeah, three times in a day isnt something special.
shareYou could clearly see his talent swinging in the moonlight while he was talking to the old guy from the doorway...
shareSome porn stars do.
My issue with this decision is that by 1979, if you wanted to have a blockbuster movie (or whatever the equivalent term would be) you had to have more than one male performer. Wayne and RJ were speculating that this was going to be a critical and commercial success. I don't know how they could think such a thing when they had the same actor in every scene in the movie. They did have two actresses (and by a stroke of luck, a third), but the same dude? For porn realism, they should have cast at least one other male performer. They could have indicated that RJ or Wayne took a scene, which did happen form time to time on '70's porn sets. In fact, it would have added a lot of authenticity if they blurred the line between cameraman and actor, producer-actor, etc.
share