I love how people are saying it went against cliche that the guy lived, a character that was so rational and level headed, but isn't making the guy the rational one a bit cliche itself (and I say that as a dude)? You all seem to think he was a saint (at least compared to his girlfriend), but by saving her initially, he indirectly caused the deaths of multiple Protectors including the main one. Sure, you can say he thought they were evil at the time, but I'm surprised he just kind of left (and they let him leave) at the end with no sense of guilt. Oh wait, guilt's an emotion, so you wouldn't understand ;-)
Plus no anger from the young, new lead Protector at the guy's Dad now being dead (they said in the Commentary they were father and son). Talk about selfless - you must really idolize him then ;-) That could have been a decent last minute twist at the end, some rule about how, if you kill the head Protector, you must stay and become one yourself. Could be cheesy, but at least have something to show his actions of saving the girl (good intentioned as they were) had consequences and he couldn't get away scott free. To keep the ending in line with the dark tone of the rest of the movie.
Oh, and you think hesitating before choosing to end or help end someone's life is only a "movie cliche"? I know we're only supposed to be logical like Vulcans on the internet, head over heart and all that, but man...some of you... Sucks to be your girlfriend if she gets possessed by a demon...just kill her, don't even bother trying exorcism, eh? ;-) /Rant
"Its only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything."
reply
share