Very good question, and by asking it you've identified a key problem with the film: although I liked it a helluva lot better than it's b.o and/or reviews would suggest, I wasn't really rooting for her to end up with either of them!!I thought it would've been interesting if she decided to go back to Tony Shalhoub's therapy and deal with her own post-jock-life choices, vs having a man fill that 'hole' so to speak. Compare it to another Reese-love-triangle movie--Sweet Home Alabama--where BOTH guys were strong candidates for her affections, but I wanted her to end up with her not-quite-ex-hubby,played by Josh Lucas, because he knew her for who she really was and not who she pretended to be. Here, despite Brooks' usually mad skills in the character development arena, he never quite digs deeply into ANY of these people. For ex, I was frustrated that Rudd never explains to her what is really going on with him, why she never bothers to ask why he keeps showing up in Owen's building,(because his father lives there) why Owen doesn't take five minutes to talk to Rudd if for no other reason than to size up this potential 'threat' to his relationship..etc. Compare this film to AS GOOD AS IT GETS for example--the complexity of those relationships/characters, and one has to say that Brooks is not improving with age. But in answer to your question, if pushed, I would've chosen the Paul character, too, because he's the better candidate for a long-term relationship. You can imagine the Owen character NOT being able to keep his monogamy pledge for very long. Plus Paul's character knows the history of Play-Dough. :)
reply
share