MovieChat Forums > The Reef (2011) Discussion > Don't they say kilometers?

Don't they say kilometers?


When the boat cap-sizes and they are weighing their options. Luke says Turtle Island is 10-12 miles. In Austraila wouldn't you use kilometers?

reply

Yes, but film producers have always got their eye on the North American market. Thus there are frequently American actors cast somewhere in Australian films (not in this case thankfully,) and terms like miles are used, to be easier touch points for Americans.

reply

Nautical miles are the unit of measurement at sea (and in the air for that matter), speed being measured in 'knots'-many people also mix the units of measure in conversation as metric isn't much good for talking about the human body for example and of course anyone who's read or seen old media material will be familiar with both metric and imperial-as far as the US is concerned, its military uses metric measurement as well.

'What is an Oprah?'-Teal'c.

reply

Nautical miles are the unit of measurement at sea...
True! But the people in this group (even the more experienced ones) are not sailors and are unlikely to use such nautical distance terms, as well as measurement terms like knots, just because they boarded a yacht. It was undoubtedly slipped in there as mentioned, so as not to confuse North Americans.

reply

The recent Malaysia Airlines tragedy has had extensive news coverage here in Australia and around the world and both units of measurement have been used, even on the local Oz coverage (have seen US news shows as well as they are broadcast here as late night 'filler'). Given this movie was a low budget production with no US stars or actors with any sort of Hollywood profile, I doubt it would even have crossed the makers' minds to try to pander to a US audience-if they'd wanted that, it would have been set in the US with their accents...

'What is an Oprah?'-Teal'c.

reply

I don't know what news coverage you've been watching but mine has been all in km, except for the occasions they've specifically mentioned nautical miles.

I doubt it would even have crossed the makers' minds to try to pander to a US audience...
I don't, in simple ways like this. If Andrew Traucki had whacked in American accents, which has happened occasionally in the past, he would have lost the domestic market.

reply

'Dead Calm' did reasonably well...again 'Reef' was a low budget film-didn't set any box office on fire-Traukl seems to only make one type of movie.

'What is an Oprah?'-Teal'c.

reply

I like The Reef a lot better than say Open Water, though I'm sure Traucki borrowed from it, as well as the 1983 real life event, upon which The Reef was based. I like his approach. He makes well-acted, economical, low budget, "B" movies. It's a pity that I don't think he's got the success he probably deserves overseas.

Traukl seems to only make one type of movie.
I kind of agree with you. Black Water was a very similar film, exchanging sharks for a crocodile. But here's the thing. I liked it better than the bigger budget Rogue, which was released around the same time. (You wouldn't credit it would you; 2 Aussie croc movies.)But yeah same sort of thing. Take a factual past event and build a horror story set against a natural back drop around it.

Dead Calm is a very classy film that I'd like to see again sometime in the near future. But it was well before Traucki's time. It was directed by one of our very fine directors Phillip Noyce, before he went and made a name for himself in Hollywood.

reply

Traukl's latest seems to follow the familiar path of small group goes into the wilderness and becomes lunch (actual or potential) for something nasty 'out there'.

'What is an Oprah?'-Teal'c.

reply

It's called The Jungle and I believe it uses the found footage approach, which while suiting his low budget approach, I personally can't stand and am pretty much over. Has it been released? I've seen no promotion of it at all.

reply

Apparently it was released on DVD last year to an utterly underwhelming response-I expect his next film will be the epic story of a young woman in a bikini who goes to make a call in a telephone box only to find it already occupied by a dingo-a life or death struggle then ensues for 90 minutes...

'What is an Oprah?'-Teal'c.

reply

LOL!

reply

[deleted]

The queen of australia uses miles so its correct to use miles

reply

[deleted]

Australians are disturbingly over-familiar with metrication, to the extent that they tend to abbreviate "kilometres" to "Ks". At least we in the UK, when absolutely forced to use the word, use it in its complete form, although most now pronounce it incorrectly as "kill-OMMeters" I can never understand why. We don't say "Mill-immeters", "Cent-immeters" nor, for that matter, "Nan-ommeters", so why the exception for Kilometres? It's KILL-ummeters. "Kill-OMMeter" should refer to an as yet uninvented device for counting the number of people or other creatures that you have killed. Like speedometer.

reply

Australians are disturbingly over-familiar with metrication
I'm not sure there's anything disturbing about it, metric is objectively a better system due to it's simplicity. I've worked with both, and although I like using imperial (not sure why but there's something very charming about it) from a practical standpoint metric is the bomb.

pronounce it incorrectly as "kill-OMMeters" I can never understand why.
Yeah that's weird to me too. Especially given the inherently logical and simple nature of the metric system. But, I suppose it they're not familiar with it......


...then whoa, differences...

reply