Why didn't Saddam lock his son up?
Considering he wasn't exactly doing the regime any favours by going round murdering, raping and maiming people I don't see why Saddam didn't slam his son in an asylum or at least put him in house arrest in one of his palaces, sure it could be construed as a sign of weakness but I hear that dictators aren't exactly renowned of loyalty to family members and surely the positives of having Uday confined would outweigh the negatives?
share