7 episodes in and it went woke

Not really. It was pretty obvious that character was a trans but was not in a "look at me I'm a trans and I have rights and I'm special and bla bla" like it was in STD. I actually liked the character and I guess it will return at some point.

So if it ain't white, it ain't right?

A Toxic, Triggered troll!

SNW was woke from the start (race swamping Lt. Kyle & Captain Robert April, Pike's bridge crew all being women & butch lesbian types, "only real life blind people should play blind characters", Jan. 6 riots caused World War III, etc.) It's just that most people were in denial about its wokeness until it SNW DIRECTLY copied STD in episode 7, and patted themselves on the back for having a real-life "Non-binary" person play a "Non-binary" character during "Pride Month".

It's interesting the "SNW isn't woke like STD" crowd won't admit they were wrong after CLEARLY being proven wrong. 90% of the people singing SNW's praises from episode 1 are just AWOL from social media now and won't discuss the show anymore, and the remaining 10% are on boards like this trying to come up with insanely goofy convulted excuses to continue the "SNW ain't woke" narrative ("well you see, the episode wasn't ABOUT the character being non-binary, nevermind the fact they had a whole scene giving a speech about how society oppresses them, blah blah blah...")

The remainder are probably embarrassed to admit they got duped. I understand desperately wanting GOOD Star Trek after seeing example after example of Star Trek In Name Only, but it was a pipe dream to think the SAME people who made STD had now "learned their lesson" and somehow not only gave us "fun" Star Trek faithful to the spirit of TOS, but also somehow magically learned how to write GOOD compelling sci-fi stories.

On the flip-side, the "zomg Superman & Lois is GOING TO go woke any minute now" crowd also has egg on their faces for the OPPOSITE reason, as we are now two seasons in, and the show NEVER "went woke". In fact, it's officially divorced itself from the Arrowverse now!

Wait, which character was trans? TELL ME! I can't believe it went undetected under my transdar. Must've been a good trap and I am all for that. If it can fool me, props to them. If it's obvious then that's a no for me.

Interesting point about "equivalent of blackface".

Its actually kinda is. "Womanface" is what it is. When that white woman Rachel Dolezal decided that she wants to be black, she was feeling inside as black and started wearing tan and curly hair then woketards called her racist, laughed at her and cancelled. And she was sincere in her adoration and respect for blacks. She truly wanted to be one. But nope.

Then same people praise every man that dressed up as woman and demand everyone to threat him as one. And attack everyone who doesnt.

Just shows how woketards dont follow their own rules and its all performative. They dont really care about anything. Now women, not trans. not blacks. Only for their own power.

When was any Star Trek not woke?

Wait, don't tell me--I'm sure you have your own personal definition of the term that's basically white, male, cis, and most at home while hanging around under bridges.

I actually didn't spot it straight-away but there was definitely something slightly off about her. So then I googled and... oh. That's why.

I was more bemused by the ludicrous notion that Spock is non-binary (in terms of being neither Vulcan nor human). I guess that was their thinking in casting her.

In a weird way, making her the villain seemed like a slightly ironic twist. I.e People who hide their true identities might be hiding other things too.