Who is to blame: Stupid people or greedy people?
The question that really rouses me from watching this film, is who is more to blame for the economic meltdown. The people who re-mortgaged and were too stupid to understand that borrowing what you can't afford to pay back is simply not a good option, or those who preyed off such stupidity to make money, yet only in the short-term, with an obvious impending back-lash from such pseudo-economics.
Can you have a democracy if the representation are mostly incapable of making simple correct/fundamental decisions? In the meltdowns case, the regulators for the banks seemed key. I found William Black (the ex bank-regulator) to be the most incisive and articulate in the film and feel that if more people like he were at the heart of the decision making regarding finance/wall-street, things could not have spiralled. I think his dam analogy was spot on as well.
It is a shame Moore is so biased, because, whilst he is clearly correct in the main assertions, they lose credibility with his doctrinaire approach (such as repeatedly asking bishops/men of the cloth about capitalism). Mention that large proportions of people are simply not equipped to make financial decisions/resist propaganda and come up with solutions to that.