MovieChat Forums > Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (2009) Discussion > The second pair of pants

The second pair of pants

posted 9 years ago by JohnSmythe
1 reply | jump to latest

CJ pretends his dog bit him to excuse why he has the bite but he lies to his friend that he didn't even get a chance to put the pants on before he bit him. This means that the 2nd pair of pants which was logged into evidence and tampered with by the DA doesn't have a hole in them from where the witness's dog bit CJ during the murder.

SO unless CJ was murdering the prostitute with both his pant legs rolled up, the actual pants from the murder should have teethmarks/holes from where he was originally bitten.

This would have proved his set-up theory without needing any corroborating evidence.

[–] LeapingLemming15 (14) 7 months ago

8 years late to this, but I'm pretty sure the dog bit the pants right when they got into the apartment. And he says something like "not yet". He then goes to the bedroom where he fakes the bite. Now, whether that bite on the 2nd pair of pants lines up correctly with his leg, who knows.