The historical context argument is shit, huh? Well there you have it, I guess. I had no idea!
Lol its not about being a slave owner, its about the use of the word as its been used throughout history. When used by white people, its been...not just a derogatory descriptor, but a hateful, belittling..."you're less than human" descriptor. That's its history...there's a lot of pain associated with that word.
When black people call each other that, they use the term "nigga", as a means of conveying brotherhood, a shared past experience...whatever. Personally, I don't care...it doesn't bother me, I couldn't care less. Whatever sociological/psychological reasoning they took that word as their own, that's none of my concern.
Which begs the question...why is it yours? What does their use of the word...how does that impact you, how does that affect your life in even the most SLIGHTEST of ways? How is it that you have a dog in the fight here? What do you have to win or lose?
I'll give you a hint: absolutely nothing. This issue affects you/your life in zero ways. The same can't be said for black people...is the thing.
Regardless, you can't just pretend stuff is different than the way it is in order to make your point. You can't ignore history and historical context to pretend you have one. And no, it may be a shared history, but there's a difference between that and the "same" history...because the history of black people in this country is far different than the history of white people.
reply
share