MovieChat Forums > A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) Discussion > worse then part 5

worse then part 5

posted 8 years ago by msreginasullivan
3 replies | jump to latest

Hard to believe that with a big budget and studio they could have made a Nightmare movie even worse then part 5 but they did it! Terrible special effects and acting. And this Freddy sucked. He wasn't scary or interesting. He was more of a geeky creeper which is not what Freddy was all about. It's a shame we'll never get another Wes Craven edition to the franchise but I am grateful for the ones we have. They are truly classics.

Best of 2016: Deadpool

[–] Moralesantjr (160) 7 years ago

it waa terrible in every way possible this should of never been made glad i didnt waste my money in theaters to see it so horrible

[–] bobbydallas (8554) 4 years ago

this is the most terrible by FAR

[–] Biggs111Mr (247) 3 years ago

Yea I saw it & thought it wasn't very good but not the worst movie in the world.