It is a bizarre image to say the least. I would like to see it blown-up by computer for more defination. The speed boat gives it a little scale and by that it's got to in extremely big. To big and to wierd of a shape to be believable.
It doesn't look like a tree that has surfaced by gas from decomposition. It is to thin and only that long part out of the water. That does not seem possible but there is also no shadow of a creature or a part of a tree under the water either, so a fake perhaps.
It doesn't match any other sightng of this "monster." I can't think of any creature living or extinct that has that long narrow neck/head (or tail) and the ability to rise that far out of the water. Sea snakes can raise about 1/4 of their length out of the water but buy the scale of this picture that snake would have to be well over 50 feet in length at least. The part out of the water is longer than the speedboat.
It's strange, I would like more info on that picture. Has it been looked at by a scientific eye? Computer enhanced? etc. I just can't buy into this one but MQ sure bit didn't they. This picture faking idiot became a lake monster expert in short order. Makes me wonder if they really investigate these people before they turn on the camera.
(On the sea snake theory, you have those dumbass brothers from San Francisco who took the video they claim is of several water snakes <100 feet in length that visit SF Bay on a regular basis. They claim to have had several up close and personal encounters with these serpents. Yet, all the evidence they have is this grainy, shaky video at distance. Why can no one who films a monster hold the f-ing camera still?)
"Some day men will look back and say I gave birth to the 20th Century...JTR"
reply
share