MovieChat Forums > Nope (2022) Discussion > Great movie....until the third act *Spoi...

Great movie....until the third act Spoilers

posted 2 years ago by GingerbreadPimp (1767)
16 replies | jump to latest

Honestly I was really digging this movie for the first 2/3rd's, but when it was revealed that the UFO was just an animal and it didn't really go beyond that it was very underwhelming. I was expecting a much better and crazier reveal for how much time it spent building up the mystery and suspense for it just to be THAT. I also didn't care for how it just became a goofy old school western in the last 20 minutes. The film worked a lot better when it was doing an equal mix of western/sci-fi horror/mystery balanced.

[–] yatzo376 (7722) 2 years ago

That didnt bother Me as much as the wacky Jaws like ending

[–] GingerbreadPimp (1767) 2 years ago

Yeah I didn't like how it just became a straight up goofy old school western in the last 10 minutes and then it ended really abruptly as soon as they defeated the animal.

[–] sONOMArEturns (1274) 2 years ago

ending really reminded me of Tremors...baiting monsters until they blow up.

[–] yatzo376 (7722) 2 years ago

Yup

[–] GingerbreadPimp (1767) 2 years ago

Very much felt Tremors-esque

[–] AnubisRaydeen (7897) 2 years ago

What, you don't like monster movies? This was a great entry into the monster movie genre. I think it was well done in every way.
9/10

[–] Burk48917 (11431) 2 years ago

It was really good, but a little backstory about the creature usually accompanies a good monster story too.

[–] Maya (116) 2 years ago

The creature had just eaten and was looking for a new place to graze. It dumps peoples stuff right after a large meal and that's how the story starts, with the debris killing the dad. I thought that was enough of a backstory for me.

Hitchcock never explained why the birds were mad but that doesn't make it a bad "monster" movie.

[–] Burk48917 (11431) 2 years ago

I literally said it was really good, I just pointed out one flaw. This is nothing like a Hitchcock film, and the Birds isn't a monster movie, so that's an odd comparison.

[–] Maya (116) 2 years ago

No need to be defensive, it's just a conversation...

And hence "monster" in quotes. It fits in with the genre while not being an actual monster.

[–] Burk48917 (11431) 2 years ago

People get defensive when someone takes someone else's words and completely flips them, which it seemed you did by defending it from being a "bad movie", which I didn't imply it was in the slightest. If it's just a misinterpretation of intent, my apologies. I think of the birds as an environmental horror. More like The Happening...but good.

[–] Volley (3433) 2 years ago

For me when it turned into a giant parachute that is where I was taken out of what was otherwise a pretty good movie. It should have kept its shape, or at least at lot less like rows of cloth, cause it looked like a cheap hollywood prop and not something... otherworldly.

Kids in the barn, the Gordy sequence & the 40 people mass abduction and then eaten were disturbingly awesome.

7/10 I'd say.

[–] jriegler (11) 2 years ago

I liked the movie a lot but agree 100% about the parachute.

[–] SteveG (1370) 2 years ago

Yeah I didnt understand that. I thought it was injured during that period and it seemed to have trouble sucking things up but I wasnt sure why that was happening.

[–] Maya (116) 2 years ago

It was injured/angry from eating the barbed wire fence.

[–] yatzo376 (7722) 2 years ago

Agreed!
Those three scenes were worth the price of admission

Great movie....until the third act *Spoilers*

Great movie....until the third act Spoilers