So far


1 episode and a but and I quite enjoy it. Not sure if it wants to be a comedy but I find a lot of reasons to laugh ,,,

Cast is quite good so far. Remains to see more and decide it's good or not.

reply

SPOILERS

I really liked it, with some reservations.

The humour does drop off a bit as the show goes on. I found episodes 1 and 2 wittier and more banter-filled than 3 and 4, but as tension ratchets up, that makes sense. I loved a lot of the characters and could watch Dillon and Grief all day. I thought the ideas being rolled around in the show were interesting and often uncomfortable - about how circumstance reveals monsters we thought we didn't contain.

My biggest gripe against the show is in episode one with the circumstances around Harry and Janice. She won't take five minutes to talk about the problem which would have prevented everything, and Harry goes into hysterical overreaction right away. It was very contrived, and I thought it could have been coordinated better to build more. It didn't feel like a real interaction, it felt like the kind of "dummy plot" where one calm word and the whole thing falls apart, and I don't like that kind of writing. There's also a moment of pure coincidence in episode 4 that prevents one character from affecting the outcome of the show, and in such a way that it felt cheap.

The mysteries and twists are well-handled, though, and the plot keeps chugging along. I genuinely had no idea where it was going in a good way. The pacing and structure are great, and for the most part the characters are presented as realistic, likeable, and interesting. All performances are good or better, too, which is nice. And again, can't get enough of Dillon and Grief.

My only other big complaint is at the end. There is too little revealed about Grief's past and his own motivations and actions in his crime. They talked about it so much throughout the show, always dodging it, always teasing, and to use it as an obvious "sequel hook" for season two (or more?) was, I thought, a little cheap, and amounted to not firing Chekov's gun. There must have been a way to reveal some of Grief's history without revealing all of it, surely, to give us at least a smidgeon of pay off to an extremely central plot.

Still, a couple of cheap TV tactics aside, I liked the show a lot, and as little as I'd want to bite the bait, I would watch season 2.

reply

My main problem was with how easy Harry allowed a problematic USB stick to be used by practically a stranger ...

reply

Yeah, that's not brilliant, but I could see how he might have accidentally dumped it into the key bin just absent-mindedly emptying his pockets.

reply

and all because with knowledge of exactly what was on it already, he just casually tossed it into a key bowl, where anybody could just pick it up ( which is of course what happened...). It would just NEVER happen
- I just don't buy that.

reply

"for the most part the characters are presented as realistic... "


That's where I'd have to respectfully disagree. I didn't find vicar and wife to be at all realistic. True I've no experience of locking a woman in my cellar following a misunderstanding, but if i ever did the thought that I would find my wife going along with the situation a total non starter.

maybe I'm the only person in the UK that doesn't think this is all "normal" ;-)

reply

I will grant you that, to some degree. The series doesn't actually show us what happens when the vicar's wife initially comes home, does it? I don't remember seeing that happen. Now that you bring it up, I do remember thinking that how he introduced the woman in the basement, as well as how he brought her on-board, was crucial information.

But I will push back insofar as, if he got her thinking as he did - that releasing their "houseguest" was not an option - his wife would act as she did after that point.

So, yes, the series should have shown us how he convinced her. It's not impossible, either, because at the point the wife enters into things, releasing Janice would result in being ostracised from the community, her son and/or husband in jail, and possibly severe financial repercussions from lawsuits. Harry would have basically said, "I know this isn't ideal, but our whole family is screwed if we let her out," and she'd have to agree with him. So, the scene could exist. After all, Shakespeare wrote that scene in Richard III where he woes Anne over the corpse of her husband (whom Richard slaughtered).

reply

Love the Shakespeare reference! (Im rehearsing for a Henry VI all-three-parts-mash-up at the moment as it is, and Richard III features prominently of course!)

Yeah _ Shakespeare's plots are full of holes, granted!

reply

I'm a big fan of Shakespeare. That project sounds super-cool.

reply

In case you are anywhere near Bath in a month's time :-)

https://www.ticketsource.co.uk/whats-on/bath/rondo-theatre/henry-vi/e-zqyvmv

reply

Thank you for sharing that! I hope you sell all the seats and break a leg!

reply