MovieChat Forums > Megan Is Missing Discussion > Opportunistic director, terrible movie, ...

Opportunistic director, terrible movie, ending for the fetish set


I love all horror film, even extreme horror, so let's get that out of the way. If you look at my rating history you'll see that I give independent and low budget film a lot of wiggle room--if there's an idea there and the story is good, I don't give a *beep* how it looks.

This movie was so bad it was unbearable. If you think that the conversation about blow jobs was necessary to further the plot, turn in your movie watcher's card now. It was there because the director has questionable taste. Seriously. There was zero narrative function for it to be that long and that drawn out. Second, girls don't talk like this, regardless of what the director says about how this conversation came about. They just don't.

Second, if Michael Goi wants to make A Serbian Film, or The Poughkeepsie Tapes, then he should be honest and make A Serbian Film or The Poughkeepsie Tapes. There's nothing I like less than a director who makes a fetish/torture porn type horror film and is disingenuous about their reasons for making it.

Whatever he says about why this film was made, the real reason it was made is so that he can freak you out with those last twenty five minutes, or whatever. Those twenty minutes are the reason you had to endure the terrible acting and the awful direction and the everything that comes before it. Incidentally, if he'd said, 'you know, I really wanted to make a *beep* up film based on child killings, and I wanted it to scare the *beep* out of you, and I hope I succeeded' I'd have far more respect for him than this BS 'I want people to be aware of the dangers of predators on the internet, blah blah blah'.

Wes Craven and Tobe Hooper never gave explanations for why they made Last House on the Left or Texas Chainsaw. They just wanted to freak people out and *beep* their *beep* up. Directors who give reasons are people I side eye.

Finally, the last twenty minutes really aren't all that scary. The shot of Megan in the bondage gear is not shocking or frightening, it's stupid and mean. As is the rape of Amy. It's there to freak you out, or, if you're a pervert, to get you going. The director is not stupid. He knows this. I don't like the film or the director and I just thought I'd put that out there.

If you haven't seen it, don't bother. The people who will find this an honest, scary film are, frankly, people who don't really watch horror as their primary genre.

Or they're little kids. Who shouldn't be watching this anyhow--not because of the subject matter, but because it's a *beep* movie. `

-------------------------
"It's better not to know so much about what things mean." David Lynch

reply

Completely agree. This movie sucked on every level. The director was so disingenuous it's almost funny.

reply

It's a *beep* ridiculous and horrid film. What a creepy little man.

"No, no! This is all about SAFETY!"

My ass it was.

-------------------------
"It's better not to know so much about what things mean." David Lynch

reply

After watching the Your Movie Sucks analysis of Megan is Missing I wanted to find the thread I originally posted after watching the film myself, but it appears to have been deleted.

Basically, I agree. I've watched more horror films than any other genre and I don't think I've come out of an ostensibly 'serious' horror film with such a certainty that the director is a wrong'n. It's not even due to the themes or even the whole point of the film, but the extended, indulgent scenes that can only exist for someone's perversion.

It also speaks volumes that one man wrote, directed and edited the film, as any other human being would surely have said to tone it down - for fear of how obviously Megan is Missing took glee in explicitly sexualising 13 year old girls.

Sayonara, not to be confused with cyanide, which is, of course, goodbye in any language.

reply

Yeah. Michael Goi is clearly a freak of the week and it shows very, very clearly in this film. You've got to love the fact that it was a one man job--hmmm. Wonder why that is? Could be everyone else looked at the script and backed slowly the *beep* away due to the fetishization and torture porning of a 13 year old.

There was no reason at all to include that *beep* unless he wanted to get some pervy motors running. It was so blatant and stupid to me that I actually yelled at the television in frustration.

Really ludicrous and a horribly stupid film.

-------------------------
"It's better not to know so much about what things mean." David Lynch

reply

I agree. I read so many reviews that discussed how disturbing this film was, and as I watched it I thought "this is pretty lame.... But apparently the last 20 minutes are messed up". Then I got to the last 20 minutes and... Nothing happened. As far as rape goes, the scene was very tame. There was one shock value shot of Megan in the barrel , and Amy begging for her life got pretty redundant. I don't blame "Josh" for putting her out of her misery. Which is a shame... The storyline had a lot of potentional.

reply