Why is Brie Larson blaming men .. sexism ,racism and Islamophobia ?

Guaranteed your post history consists of Donald Trump content even though he hasn't been president for almost 3 whole years, and will never get near the white house again........

Just checked, and I'm right. Obsessed with T.R.U.M.P.

Here's a snapshot. https://imgur.com/a/Qc6TGmG

Just one page and it goes on and on and on and on and on....TRUMP.TRUMP.TRUMP.TRUMP.

Your post history from the last month and beyond is 99% TRUMP posts. It's astonishing, sad, pathetic and kinda tarnishes your ability to think straight and be taken seriously......seriously. Especially when talking about movies. Maybe stick to politics, old outdated politics that is.

The old fart was voted out almost 3 years ago. He was one of the most hated presidents of all time. Get over it, it's over, he is not coming back.

Anyway, besides your psychosis, I'll be back after the weekend to decimate your trivial strawman-clutching trash, blabbing nonsense. I skimmed through that garbage you copy pastad and you failed to put a single argument together or point. Do you want to try again, except a little harder so I have something to bite on?

Cya next week. Meanwhile, continue obsessing over an old balding man in a suit who was voted out 3 whole years ago.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

1. She should be urging more black women to get into film journalism and reviews.

I have never seen a publicist present to the press what Brie Larson does or champions with the exception of her 2019 honoring for the following initiative: "Along with 300 other Hollywood women, she helped orchestrate the Time’s Up initiative in 2018. She also has an inclusion rider that specifies a specific level of diversity in casting and production staff. In 2019 she was honored for her work with the Equal Justice Initiative by Variety"

Irrelevant. Pointless. No point mentioning Times Up. As you said, nothing she has done gets more black women to get into journalism. Only 1 rant about white males. With the adage that she wants to see non-white males as reviewers because she doesn't want to hear viewpoints of white males.

2. It's a demographic problem. They just don't want to.

That is a pretty harsh assumption. No demographic is totally homogenous or monolithic but industry awareness and exposure is an inducement and all that is needed to make a change and in many ways wanting access to those types of careers or creative endeavors to exposed groups.

So you didn't prove it otherwise? Further down your blab, you agree that it may be the case.

You doubt there are careers certain demographics are not as drawn to? Funny that the majority of sewage workers, and garbage disposal are male in a huge majority. I suppose middle-aged black women aren't drawn to working in sewers? Or am I incorrect in saying that?

"industry awareness and exposure". As if black women need to be taught that the job of a film critic exists. lmao The doors are open, all you need is a camera and a mike, go watch a movie, review it on camera, upload it to Youtube. Do that for a long time and build a channel. Simple. There are no gates, no barriers put up by straight white males.

3. Look at all the freelance reviewers on Youtube with their own channels and constant content. How many are middle-aged black women?

That is a very good example.

It is, not many then? Majority males?

There are many Youtube influencers that have monetized their content.

Erm, ok then? Thanks for letting me know that content creators accepted their content to be monetized.

Since Larson spoke on this topic Rotten tomatoes did expand their reviewers list and it is now more inclusive.

You have a press release from RT saying that Brie Larson was directly responsible?

reply share

add reply

formatting help

4. Brie is kinda dumb and a misandrist.

Another rather "harsh" assessment not based on anything Larson has ever said or done or advocated. Advocating "For" something is not equivalent for pushing back against something else. Larson wanted MORE seats at the table or the "Gates", she never stated that she wanted to replace anyone.

It's not harsh. It's calling a spade a spade. She got a few bad reviews, chucked a hissy fit, wanted to rant about white male reviewers, and gate keep her movie. She's basically saying white male reviewers do not have any objectivity or impartiality.

"I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time," said the future Captain Marvel. "It wasn’t made for him!"

Kinda racist, misandrist and dumb.

Next she'll be saying the front of the bus is not made for straight, white males. Who is she to say what colour of skin or gender a movie is made for, and if they are paid to watch and write about films their opinion doesn't count over somebody with a different skin colour and gender.

And it's hypocritical. Notice, she only complains about the negative reviews. Positive ones she will gladly take from straight, white males. She may think she has good intentions, but her personal biases, tendency towards sexism and misandry cast a dark cloud on her "good intentions". Then other than her rant didn't follow up on her "good intentions" and dropped the mike.

"The fact that Ava DuVernay" What on earth are you blabbing about? Another director complaining about bad reviews. It's the nature of the beast. Films come out, people are paid to review them, the general audience talks about them. Word of mouth. Gate keeping reviews to non-white males in the hopes to get fake praise isn't going to solve anything.

reply share

add reply

formatting help