Honestly, I don't know if I want to see a director's cut. Director's cuts should be for really impressive, tight, beloved films where the fans are practically begging for more. The LotR special Editions are like this. They filmed so much book influenced and character developing stuff that had to be cut out to make the movie flow better....so getting to see what they cut in a well directed and edited version showed an appreciation to the fans.
I feel the same way about the No Way Home Spiderman movie. Yea, it was a lot of fan service but we ate it up and now they are releasing a new edited version and I am excited to see it. another scenario where I am sure a lot of improve, jokes, and other great moments had to be cut for the betterment of the overall movie. To release more stuff shows an appreciation to the fans.
Love and Thunder though....it's just tacky. You can't edit a movie where you prioritized a cheap joke after cheap joke over the betterment of the plot. 2-4 hours of material that probably would have been better in this film than what was actually used. That annoys me. That's not showing appreciation, that's almost like an apology. 'we're sorry we gave you crap...here...maybe this will make up for it...'. At least the director said he didn't want a director's cut. I dunno. I just think, in this case, if they wanted more Sif then it should have been put in the cut. Hell, she was so wasted in this film, they could have cut her all together and saved her time and them money. Any generic walk on could have given the exposition she gave.
Wow...I sound like I really hated this movie, lol I enjoyed it (to a point) while in the theater....but I just keep thinking about how different it was from Thor and Dark World and I preferred those movies so much more and it gets me riled up, lol I wouldn't go and say the movie is unwatchable and horrible...it just wasn't 'my Thor'.
reply
share