Nothing New Under the Sun


I missed this film when it came out a few years ago but do remember that it generated a lot of interest as well as critical acclaim.

I eventually caught it on TV recently and while Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence have undoubted screen chemistry, I don't really get the hype surrounding this movie. I was expecting something fresh and exciting, but for me the story seemed pretty derivative, as was the ending. I can't help feeling that I've seen the same story told on screen many times. Frankie and Johnny starring Al Pacino and Michelle Pfeiffer immediately springs to mind.

I also find it interesting that both films have very attractive actors in the lead roles. I am not arguing that they are not fine actors, they are. It would just be so refreshing if, for once, film studios were unafraid of portraying romantic themes with actors who look just like regular folk.

Frankie and Johnny is a case in point. Kathy Bates created the role of Frankie on stage but was replaced in the film by Pfeiffer. Although the on screen pairing of Pacino and Pfeiffer works perfectly well, I think it would have been a much better and more interesting film had Kathy Bates not been replaced.

The USP for Silver Linings Playbook seems to be the theme of mental illness. Having no professional experience in this field, I wondered if the film had portrayed mental illness in a realistic and appropriate manner. It would be interesting to hear the views of a health care professional.


CARRY ON CLEO
Ceasar: If Cleopatra and this other upstart ...
Brutus: Ptolemy?
Ceasar: I am telling you!










reply

This movie was extremely overrated and very unoriginal.

reply

I didn't think so at all, greyhelm, with all due respect to you, and I find it very good. Jennifer Lawrence won an Oscar (even if one would expect her other 2012-vintage auspicious rise to box office success, "Hunger Games", to well, take a Lawrence "Katniss" like well-aimed arrow at the Oscar..with plunger to grab on.)

PROFILE PIC:Courtney Thorne-Smith.

reply

Agreed. I won't deny this movie did receive a lot of hype. Normally, when movies get too much hype, I end up not liking them because I expect them to be better than what they really are. However, I still had a poor attitude about this movie when I decided to watch it, and I ended up loving it. I saw what all the hype was about :)

reply

I never knew that about F&J, that it was actually an old play and that Kathy Bates played Frankie recently right before the movie was made. From what I just read, it was a pretty big point in the script that Frankie was a bit of a "dumpy older broad," middle aged and out of shape, so casting Pfeiffer does seem pretty damn cynical. Hardly surprising though.

reply

I agree with you Druffmaul. A quarter of a century has elapsed between these two films and studio attitudes towards female casting appear to be no more enlightened than they were back in 1991. Depressing.

CARRY ON CLEO:
"Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it in for me!"

reply