First 15 min here !


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_srUoXqYrg

reply

very bad sign when you have to start releasing part of the movie first just to get people to interested in it.

reply

Not necessarily. They did the same thing for Snyder's DOTD back in the day and that turned out to be a great movie.

reply

It was a decent movie but one that just was an updated copy and paste from the original.

This looks like a Micheal Bay style movie but without the the good stuff from Michael Bay.

reply

I loved it. I think it's better than the original. If this is anywhere near as good as DOTD it should be a fun ride. I wasn't overly impressed with the trailer but I'm still looking forward to watching it. I'm not sure if I even wan't to watch the first 15 minutes beforehand.

reply

DOTD was more of slow build-up and more of small scale action with alot of emotion/substance.

This on the other hand just seems a bloated big scale/cgi blockbuster with alot of action but without any sort of emotion in it alot like all of the synders DCEU movies.

reply

I don't mind that it's bloated and big scale, could be fun, what bothers me are the smart zombies, not digging it. But I'm interested to see how it plays out.

reply

i don't mind big scale movies like lord of the rings or star wars (OT) but they have to still convey some sort of grand scheme of things, this seems like they just added alot of big scale action to a small scale movie abit like the fast and furious and transformer series where it started of grounded story as much as it can be and they just kept taking it bigger and bigger for no reason apart from making it look cooler and this seems the same, it seems style or substance and Synder is definitely once of those type of directors.

I agree smart zombie just stops becoming a zombie when it cares about other things then just lusting after food.

reply

I've already seen Army of the Dead in theaters. It is a terrifically fun and exciting movie that I highly recommend if you're a fan of Zack Snyder or the zombie genre. It's got a lot of great action and tension, excellent gore and make-up effects, an overall excellent cast, and great deal of really fascinating world-building. I thought the zombie civilization was one of the film's most intriguing plot elements. But they still have the mindless zombies in addition to the smart ones, so I thought the film delivered the best of both worlds in that regard.

I saw in the cast list that Richard Cetrone plays the zombie king Zeus in this film, and I thought he did a terrific job, one of the most memorable horror villains in a long time. I was wondering why his name looked so familiar and saw that he played the lead Martian ghost (or whatever they were) in Ghosts of Mars and thought he was terrible in that film. He really redeemed himself here!

I did have a few issues. The father-daughter bond between Dave Bautista and Ella Purnell just didn't fully work for me. I thought Bautista was excellent in the film, but Purnell was the weak link of the cast. Snyder also introduces a new kind of zombie in one of the last battle scenes that was a bit of a WTF moment for me. It's so brief and not given any explanation that I think it should have been cut out or reserved for the inevitable sequel. The final scenes were entertaining, but definitely stretched my suspension of disbelief. I'm also uncertain as to what happened to one particular character, whose fate appeared to occur off screen.

As far as how this compares to Snyder's Dawn of the Dead? To me, the DOTD remake actually my favorite zombie film so Army of the Dead is not quite as good, but it's still fairly close and does now rank among my favorite zombie films (off the top of my head, it's somewhere in my top 10). I definitely can't wait to re-watch it again on Netflix. It's an 8.5 out of 10 for me.

reply

something a little fishy here - you seen the movie at the theatres which was shown 2 days ago - but write about it just after the camera copy of the movie is released - with enough time to download and watch a copy.

reply

I saw it on Friday night at my local Cinemark theater, but it's still playing in theaters. As far as I know, it'll still be in theaters up through May 20.

reply

This statement just proves you haven't watched the original or haven't in a long while. Just about the only similarity between the two is the setting of a shopping mall and one of characters being a cop while the original had two cops as the leads and a much smaller main cast. Where is the marauding biker gang in the remake? Where is the pregnant infected woman in the original? You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

reply

it's been a long time seen I've seen the remake and even longer since i saw the original when was in my teens, it wasn't a fully copy and paste job but updated in time with a differences but nowhere near enough to call it a new film, overall is still a remake of the original.

reply

Watch the original again and hopefully you'll realize they're vastly different films. The original's critique on consumerism is totally absent from the remake. The original centered on 4 characters while the remake had about a dozen.

reply

Yup, it’s ass.

reply