Maker of this film is some sicko?
It didn't strike me as a normal thriller/horror. I think the writer or director was fulfilling some sick fantasy. That's just the feeling I get from it.
shareIt didn't strike me as a normal thriller/horror. I think the writer or director was fulfilling some sick fantasy. That's just the feeling I get from it.
shareNice boat, though.
sharereally nice
sharethat boat was incredible
...and it saddens me.
I agree about the boat, but as for the OP--what are you talking about? The movie was a fantasy up until the "donkey punch" (two pretty girls having sex with three guys in the same room on video), but after that it was a frickin' horror movie that wasn't exactly meant to turn ANYBODY on.
Sexy interludes in balls-out horror movies are like drinking a cold beer in a hot tub. They're both enjoyable, but for a COMPLETELY different reasons. A normal person isn't going to start bathing in a vat of cold beer and drinking hot-tub water, and a normal person watching this movie isn't going to be sexually turned on either by the "donkey punch" or all the gory violence that follows. I didn't really care for this movie, but give the people who did some credit for knowing the different between a hot sex fantasy and blood-soaked nightmarish horror (even if they both occur in the same movie).
This movie sounds awesome. Just ordered an unrated copy on Amazon. Good deal, too. Only 6 bucks.
shareHonestly, the whole "donkey punch" thing was stupid as hell. Hitting somebody on the back of the neck during sex wasn't going to kill anybody----up 'til then, the movie was actually pretty good---but after that scene, I was like, "Oh, come the hell on! That was so stupid!" And the two girls just happening to be high enough to kiss each other---yeah, that was definitely put in there for a male audience to jerk off to---I mean that really didn't need to be in slow motion,anyway. Now if that scene would have been done with two guys,that would have really been an eye-opener,lol.
share