MovieChat Forums > Good Dick (2008) Discussion > Why such a low rating?

Why such a low rating?


I mean I know not many people have had a chance to see this, but I am kind of surprised by the 5.1 rating. The trailer looks good to me. Can anyone who has seen this weigh in?

reply

Saw it in Edinburgh in June. Great reception by the audience, very funny yet moving film, Marianna deservedly won Best New Director award. Should be a 7 or 8, don't know who's voting so low for this.

reply

it definitely deserves the 5.1 rating. it should actually be lower. wasted two hours of my life at a sneak peek of the film. the characters were poorly developed. what sounds good on paper obviously wasn't translated well on screen. there was nothing loveable about the main character and the acting just came off as a technical, dry reading of the script. but jason ritter did play his role well. for those of you who havent seen it, i say don't waste your time. i can't believe it was well received at film festivals.

reply

I thought it was an excellent film and my own rating should now help to push it up a little.

Very funny but also very moving and a nice change from the usual Hollywood paint by numbers.

reply

I think some people are just jealous. The movie was great, one of the most refreshing dark "romantic" comedies I've seen in a while. It somewhat reminds me of Shopgirl. The characters were funny, the directing was good (haha, some shots of the characters reactions were timeless.) I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who likes quirky comedies with substance.


"That's the clitoris by the way."

reply

>>"I think some people are just jealous."

Yea, and I think some people have a need to be seperate from the crowd and see something that isn't there so they can at least say they "get" something that othr just "don't".


Face it, we are all the same, some of us just try to cover it up.

reply

[deleted]

Dunno... great review here, tho:

http://shareddarkness.com/2008/10/08/good-dick.aspx

Sounds really interesting...

reply

[deleted]

I had high hopes for this film, having seen the trailer...but what a disappointment. Full marks for trying to do something different with the 'boy meets girl' thing - in this case, video shop geek (Jason Ritter) meets porn-obsessed near-agoraphobic little rich girl (Marianna Palka). Niche, but promising. Unfortunately, there's no emotional payoff and okay, love is blind and all that, but we never really understand WHY this nameless guy would pursue (hell, let's be honest, stalk ) this nameless and resistant girl. And who exactly are we rooting for here? When the girl cleans up her act, puts on a dress (aah, she's pretty, really!), gets a job (we know this from two almost subliminal scenes of her in a coffee shop?)and confronts her creepy Daddy, it all happens so fast it just doesn't ring true. The tone is nicely downbeat and discomfiting (which is fine) but also uneven and unengaging (which isn't). With all that dirty talk it should have been very funny, but it just falls flat. There's an emotionally charged scene, for instance, between the video shop owner, Eric and our 'hero' which hints at an interesting backstory, but it comes out of nowhere - and then goes nowhere. A shame, because there is a great idea here which, with the right treatment, could have been an oddball classic.

reply

i went to see this film because the one i wanted to see was sold out. best day of my life! i really loved the film. i thought it was quite self-aware, but not to the point of being anti-illusionist. and it definately had the audience laughing; it might not be for everyone, but i would recommend it, especially to film geeks!

reply

Homemade videos featuring kids' birthdays have better cinematography than this drivel.

reply

The movie was great, coming from a wanna be director myself.

The movie had far more style and substance than alot of hollywood crapfests.

Those peeps that don't like, probably are virgins and don't understand women.

Or... are successful enough to where they choose the girl and if they are getting annoyed by them, dump them for another because they can.

Or.... relationship movies bore them anyways. Other than that I can't see a reason to hate the movie. I am very picky and loved it. It's a harsh look into a strange character, but I was certainly hoping he would crack her shell eventually.

http://www.vimeo.com/1986276

reply

[deleted]

Here's what A.V. Club had to say.

"In Marianna Palka's quirked-out romantic comedy, homeless video-store employee Jason Ritter becomes smitten with a mousy, porn-obsessed customer played by Palka. Ritter is the kind of cutesy emo-boy who sleeps on Palka's couch, then wakes up early so he can tie a string to her foot, attached to a thank-you note in the other room. And she's the kind of impenetrably offbeat gal who doesn't think it's strange when he insists on washing her hair before he'll let her wear a piece of jewelry he wants to share. Not a single line or gesture in Good Dick has anything to do with the world in which real people live, but it's just another day in increasingly irrelevant Indieville."

Don’t blame someone else for setting the trap that you were stupid enough to walk into.

reply

The title is classic.

FYC: Rosemarie DeWitt, Anne Hathaway, and Melissa Leo

reply

Looks like AV Club got it right.

Totally silly, and painfully unrealistic.


reply

"Painfully Unrealistic"... Because your reality is the same as my reality, right?



"Nobody puts Baby in the corner!"

reply

So this movie had to be realistic to be good? Maybe I just like quirky.



Also, I'm holding a sarcasm immunity cloak. +10 defense.

reply

The rating is 6.1 which is a bit high if you ask me. I think it's about a 5.9. Rock on!

reply

I just finished watching this and I thought it was very good. I watch at least one movie every day and I have to say, this film was very good but not perfect. I'd attribute the 1/10 votes on IMDb to haters only. Almost no film deserves a 1/10 and unfortunately fans will vote 10/10 to counter the bullsh!t 1/10 hater votes.

As for the story, of all the 6 Billion people living on Earth, I think it's quite possible that there are characters and situations such as those depicted in this film. Sorry to those who think it was unrealistic, but I do believe you've been conditioned to expect only certain hackneyed situations and characters in movies. I'd take THIS kind of film/story over the cliche bullsh!t of "guys with guns" that neophyte filmmakers seem intent on propagating.

It was hard to watch at times but it was worth it.

Great soundtrack. Great leads. Great casting. Great writing. Great direction.

I was a little confused by the casting of Tom Arnold. I'm not sure, since his role was so small, what good it does to cast a known celebrity in a film full of unknowns. He kind of stands out like a sore thumb at a time in the story where you really shouldn't be distracting from the storyline.

I'll be looking for more films from this director.

reply

Tom Arnold played Jason Ritter's (the main character) dad in Happy Endings, so maybe since they had worked together before he just did a small role.
And as to realistic characters, well I thought the main guy was odd but I have known some clingy eastern Europeans like him. And as for the girl, well she pretty much acted like somebody who had been terribly molested as a child. I had one friend who covered it up pretty well, until she finally told off her dad and broke away from her family. I thought it was a very believable account of what an sexually abused girl might turn out to be.

reply

I thought this movie was really, really good. Best one I've seen in a while and I watch quite alot of movies.

reply

I didn't have an issue with any of the characters as "realistic" but I think the guy asking for a courtesy flush in Austin Powers was a little distracting.

reply

I agree with screaming foot. I just finished watching the movie and thought it was very good. I know many more people, including myself who are more similar to these characters than to the sappy, predictable always happy ending scenarios that Hollywood repeatedly spews out. Sometimes normal people are dry. We are not all drama queens with non-stop wit and energy.

There were times that just like real life you didn't want to watch or to relive. In my opinion, the cinematography could have been better as could have the music. Also, Tom Arnold was a bit distracting. But overall a refreshing movie. I would recommend it to any thinking audience. Those who love tried and true fairy-tales may not enjoy the movie. I gave it an 8.

reply

Because the MPAA is a force of PRUDE religious rich f_cks! They will do whatever they can to burry this movie, because the truth of it embarrasses them. Just look at what happened to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106471/ Boxing Helena and http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0414951/ The Quiet, which both are very similar come to think of it;
Strong women make a VERY TRUE and GOOD movie, deserve a REALLY high rating, so they need to be pushed down by the jealous fat menopausal ladies at the MPAA, and of course by the jealous idiots out there that never understand humans and/or their behaviour, let alone know what love is when it doesn't involve the normal socially accepted routines.

reply

Techstar, your review was terrific and acurate.

I LOVED this film. So unique. Great, complex and troubled characters desperate to connect and feel love. So very touching. Ritter was awesome.

I completely related and understood what Marianna was creating here.

I find it almost troubling that anyone would write that this film is "unrealistic"...how closed off into suburbia plastic life are you to not know how painful life is for most people? So many hurt and messed up people are all around us. How hard life is for a woman. How do you live in this world and not see & feel the pain? On second thought, if you don't feel the pain or understand this film, then simply consider yourself really lucky.

reply