Broader meaning...?


Could it be that a broader idea to the story is the writer/director providing some sort of theory as to why London, or megacities in general, are increasingly seen as impersonal, soulless places? ie. those who inhabit these cities are becoming more unfriendly and soulless (the doppelgangers), this perhaps linked somehow with the idea that in parallel, people are becoming increasingly more vain (the idea of the mirror image getting revenge).

It seems to me that beyond replacing their originals, the doppelgangers aren't actually evil. They don't seem intent on killing off loads of other people or going on crime sprees or anything like that, they're just substituting themselves for the originals and gradually making the city a duller, less friendly place.

This ties in with the idea that people beyond the circle of the family in the film have also been taken over by their doubles (the old lady with the sixth sense pointing them out in the train, the dogs, Asian man with oranges, stats about the increasing number of mirrored people in the x-rays, etc).

I think the film could be an analogy for the way the writer sees society heading.

reply

Indeed. I rewatched the film yesterday after getting it on Blu-ray. Later that day I went to work and while there passed some young lady in a hallway, said "hello" and barely got a reaction. Couldn't help but think about the film and the indifferent doppelgangers.

reply

The doctor also said that the syndrome, where a person thinks that a family member has been replaced with someone else, has been seen most often the last 20 years. Maybe more doppelgangers has come out in the last 20 years - as cities have grown.

Anyway, nice to know that someone cares about this broader meaning og not just the small stuff in this movie. It seems fairly irrelevant if you understand it.

reply