MovieChat Forums > The Thing (2011) Discussion > Creatures not subversive enough

Creatures not subversive enough


I like the film but it did need some improvements.

I think the creatures could have been more inventive / subversive together with any specifically created music for the transformations and subsequent actions.

The characters needed more development - I think we should have seen more of their everyday interactions so we could have had a chance to know them better and hence felt more empathy when they met their horrible ends.

They just came across as a group of banal bearded Norwegians who we knew nothing about.

The Kate Lloyd character just seemed to spend most of the film looking wide eyed in amazement - her facial expression reminding me of the 'Big Eyes' paintings.

Finally Ulrich Thomsen's portrayal of Dr. Sander Halvorson came across as a tired Sam Neill.


reply

"I think the creatures should have been more inventive/subversive together with any specifically created music for the transformations and subsequent actions."

Totally agree with you. The creatures, except the Edvard-Adam Split Face all looked like Austrian biker chicks with long dreadlocks. They should have been more diverse just like the ones in the 1982 Carpenter film!

Go, Miami Redhawks!!!

reply

I wanted to see the original creature in full before it started absorbing people. We only get glimpses of it, though. And, after it is all charred up.

One question: How does this distorted, clawed creature pilot a giant, sleek spacecraft?

reply

New The Thing (2011) criticism just dropped;
- The lead actress has big eyes.

reply

This guy nails it. Fun pop corn flick. Lots of room for improvement

reply

MEH OVERALL.

reply