Really not a fan of the director or his style of humour, very basic and childish his film are just not funny and don't really work. I don't think he has ever heard of subtle or deapan humour.
Steve Martin tried his best, but he needed more help by somone with better comic direction like John Landis, with more advanced comic skills. I doubt it would of been great but at least there could of been some laughs.
instead of upcool why don't you just upyourasss
i mostly will not be able to answer your reply, since marissa mayer hacked my email, no notification
Instead of butchering both the english language and people's names (How does 'Ubcool' become 'upcool'?), why don't YOU just learn some english and perhaps buy a better keyboard, understand that english has something called 'capitalization' and that there is such a thing as SHIFT-key in existence...
Maybe then someone could actually try to decipher what you are actually trying to say with your verbal vomit that's stinking up these boards.
"Somone"?
I think you are correct, when you look at Sellers, you can feel the intensity and serious intentions of this man, and that makes the comedy all the funnier.
When you look at Steve's version of the character, you immediately feel like he's faking something to try to make you laugh, he's TRYING HARD to be, sound and act 'ridiculous' so you would laugh. Sellers comes off as a GENUINE CHARACTER, Steve's version comes off as a RIDICULOUS, STUPID CARTOON.
It wouldn't EVEN be that bad, if he was at least funny. But he isn't.