Slow, lacks an ending.
It could have been a better movie; the ending just didn't cut it for me. It was creepy and weird, which was fine, but it went nowhere. To date it is the worst movie experience I have had, which says plenty.
shareIt could have been a better movie; the ending just didn't cut it for me. It was creepy and weird, which was fine, but it went nowhere. To date it is the worst movie experience I have had, which says plenty.
shareThat has to be one of the most ignorant comments i have ever heard. To say that this is your worst movie experience is saying you know very little if anything at all about film. This movie was very thoughtful and inventive. It makes you think and really goes into how people view life. This movie is for the more inttelligent i would say.
shareYes obviously he or she isn't intelligent enough just because he or she didn't like the movie.
shareI like this movie, but it wasn't inventive; I already owned this movie twice before I bought it. Cavanagh was good, and the visuals were gorgeous, but this was a better movie when Tim Robbins starred in it. Hell, even Jerry O'Connell beat this film to the punch.
shareIt has a very obvious ending. They messed up the procedure, but not the way we were lead to believe. He was in a coma and dreaming. In his dreams he had to face his fears, and that's how he was released from his coma (and died).
shareTo me the movie had an interesting concept going... but lacked a few things.
I thought the script lacked development and so did most of the characters.
As an avid horror/psychlogical thriller fan, I expected more.
Again good concept, but lacking in execution.
(In my humble opinion)
P.S the fact that someone doesn't enjoy the film, does not make them less intelligent then a fan of it. I think making such a statement is a sign of lesser intelligence... ;)
The only thing that's slow is YOU for not understanding this movie and it's ENDING.
share