Jlent, my man. I think you have the whole outlook here incorrect. What I gleaned from the director's "message" was an effort to point out the absurdity of stereotypes, religious or otherwise. Maureen was truly a good Christian, unlike some anti-religious stereotype of one, and a good friend to Diana in spite of her issues. She truly loves her as a friend. Diana, on the other hand is painted as a troubled teen who smokes, has sex, an abortion, makes bad decisions, etc. - in short, all the things you would associate with "un-Christian" behavior. In spite of this, she sacrfices herself for her friend. Why? If this were a piece of Christian propaganda, this would be the wrong message. The real message here is that it doesn't matter if you are Christian or not. It matters what kind of person you are. Diana sacrifices herself for her friend because she loves her, not through any feelings of low esteem. She obviously thinks she has a future in her moment of flash-forward, and even then decides to die for Maureen. This is about all people and the acts they are capable of, and is actually, I believe, antithetical to your argument. I think the abortion/daughter plot point was there for story arc links and nothing more. This is the director's vision I am talking about. I haven't read the book so I don't know what the author's point of view was, if the same, different, or what.
reply
share