What I never understand..
when I read posts in here is how people often seem to be divided between those that think that Chris was kind of awesome for wanting to go off and live in the wild(and possibly try to copy this line of thinking) and the others who feel that he was selfish/stupid/unprepared, etc. and possibly deserved what he got. That seems so simplistic..I took a totally different message or meaning from it.
What I thought was so sad about the movie was that here is this young guy who thinks he knows the 'secret' to fulfillment and happiness, if only he can get away from his current life(isn't this kind of a common rabbit trail in life? 'I'll be happy and fulfilled if only I can move here or get this job, etc.?'). He rejects consumerism and thinks he has it all figured out. He connects with many people along the way, but leaves broken hearts behind him as he continues to doggedly push forwards to his goal of 'finding himself' or getting back to nature or whatever. At the end he finally realizes that he missed the deepest truth all along..the truth that was there in the experiences he had with all those people who cared about him along the way, and those he left behind. That happiness is only real when shared. But he learns the lesson too late, and he dies.
It's heartbreaking! Yes, he is selfish. He is stupid, he is unprepared. Why does the central character in a movie have to be totally likable or make good decisions? That doesn't mean the audience can't feel sympathy and pain for how lost he was. Sometimes wisdom comes too late, and that's a tragedy. But it happens all the time. Lots of people his age(and even those that are older) are as lost emotionally as he was. To me the movie has depth because it is a cautionary tale, and has a pretty deep lesson to it. Maybe it means different things to different people, but to me it values contentedness and being thankful for what and who you have in your life.