Both movies are bad from a base level: concept, story, characters. So you can't win with either.
But Requiem is far more enjoyable to watch. It at least has some action, some gore, and it's a pretty hilarious experience when you really think about it: Aliens just POP-UP overnight in a small US town. These people would be like WTF is going!?!?! Think of the pool scene. Some high school kid is about to get laid, gets jumped, then some MONSTER jumps into the pool and gores them. Then, that girl who walks into the kitchen and sees her boss mutilated. Haha. What must she have been thinking? At least the premise of this movie was a bit more enjoyable than the horrid first one.
But don't get me wrong! Both movies have severe technical issues with the source material, and are both unfaithful to Aliens and Predators alike. Predators come off as being utter idiots, and Aliens are just fodder ... though in reality, they would be --- people give a single Alien too much credit. In a war of species, these things would be a mass-numbers prevail or null concept, that's it. Otherwise they are fodder, especially against weapons. Why do you think all the movies take place in CQC narrow hallways? To give them legitimacy... I digress.
Anyway. I always liked this movie more than AVP. AVP just felt like a 13 year old Tomb Raider movie. It was literally AWFUL. They even used Matrix slow-motion, just like every movie of 2014 did. Slow-mo in an Alien movie? The whole point of the creature is to be subtle, quick, and deadly ... not to slow down the action in freeze-frames.
I never got it thought. This movie is SUCH AN EASY CONCEPT TO GET RIGHT. Here's your premise: Aliens (2). Just add Predators. There, done. Have fun. That's all they ever needed to do. No Earth *beep* No past crap. Just future Aliens universe, marines, and predators in a bar room brawl on LB0000022929292929. The story writes itself. Just make sure to make in the 1980's so it stands a chance of actually being good. Anything after that ... haha, good luck.
reply
share