MovieChat Forums > Stardust (2007) Discussion > Compared to the book?

Compared to the book?


I haven't read the book. I saw the film a few years ago when it was new and most of it again tonight. I can't help but think the same now as I did then: it feels rushed.

Maybe I am not part of the target group (I'm M20), but even as a 15-year-old I had problems with it. I don't mind the actors or setting, but the script is a bit dry and some scenes feel rushed or out of place. (Tristan departing from his father is one, Tristan and Yvaine being captured by the pirates another.) On the other hand, I think the witches get too much screentime and their scenes rely too heavily on humor and/or special effects. The "final battle" verges on bizarre to me. Robert de Niro is the best part of the film, and I like the seven princes - but I just can't bring myself to take it very seriously.

I know Neil Gaiman is a much liked writer, so I'm wondering if the book is similar or if the story may simply suffer from being compressed into a feature film. Since it receives such praise on here, what do you love so much about it? Is it the romance, the magic, the humor? I do not mind YA and I think Hunger Games and The Mortal Instruments are all right (again, have not read the books), but I absolutely detest Twilight in book and film format, and I dislike The Golden Compass film because they butchered the book's storyline.

reply

There are quite a few differences brewin between the book and the film. The time time periods between scenes is one that ibdont think would translate well to film.

I do strongly suggest reading it, it is a short read. And enjoyable.

I like each version for its own spin.

reply

This is one of the rare occasions that I feel the movie outshines the book. I can't remember why, but I know I didn't like the book as much.

reply

The book is superior to the movie by far! The movie seems rushed because some characters were expanded (to make better use of the actors playing the parts) so scenes were changed/added cutting others that helped with the pacing.

Gaimen is a wonderful writer but this book didn't transition to the big screen as well as I hoped it would. Coraline was a more successful book to screen project.

reply

I enjoy this movie, but watching it again I do feel there are some strange moments. For instance, timing just feels weird. When they are on the pirate ship I thought they had been there for a long time, but it turns out to be only a day or two. I know Tristan needs to get the star back to Victoria within a week but that made everything that happened seem implausible for me. For some reason I thought that time in Stormhold was meant to be far quicker than time in the Wall (like a month in Stormhold would only be a day or two in the Wall), but then I realized when Yvaine said something about the timeframe that it was meant to be the same. Just made everything on the ship seem like too much (for instance, Tristan learning to fence).

I also agree that the final battle is weird. Mainly I don't know why the witch fakes out Tristan and Yvaine. She releases them only to be like "Ha just kidding!" but it seemed like such a stupid thing to do. I know they needed to have Tristan/Yvaine beat her, but it was a bit of a copout. Now I know this is a fantasy and not everything is meant to be totally plausible. I get that, and I actually don't mind this. I am just pointing these things out. I still really like the movie.

reply

The movie is definitely better than the book.

The movie fixes some of the problems in the book and introduces some interesting elements or twists (e.g., Captain Shakespeare). Of course, it then introduces its own problems. But in the end it's a more satisfying trip.

The book is fine, just nothing particularly special and nowhere near any of Gaiman's better work, which can at times be breathaking it's so good. Although Gaiman wasn't a writer on the film, I can't help but think he had some input on streamlining some of the plot points. For example (and this is not a spoiler), in the book, Tristan has a father and mother. In the movie, he only has a father. How this is resolved is much better in the movie.

Anyway, they're both good...go enjoy both!

reply

It was a clear cut fantasy film. You need to remember, this wasn't meant to be some dramatic action film. It was a cute fantasy film in the vein of classic romantic fantasy tales like the princess bride. It's a family film and to me it's a great story. I cared about the characters regardless of how cheesy it gets at times and I knew that it wasn't meant to be taken too seriously especially since it's supposed to be the kind of movie that you could see with your family.

reply