I thought that the opening shot of the bird might provide a clue to the film. By the end, I realized that the bird represented the free spirit of Kurt who says, "I've never gotten myself into anything that I couldn't get myself out of." In comparison, Mark has become a caged bird. I was struck by how quickly after his momentary freedom in the woods when he lowered his wedding ring into the water, Mark reverted to his caged ways by cluttering his mind with the chatter of the talk radio broadcast on the drive home. Parked outside his house, he seems to regret having to go back into his cage. In the final scene, Kurt's free spirit allows his innate compassion to respond to the panhandler, and yet sadly, he doesn't seem to be at home in his freedom. The youthful joy that both men once knew has become old.
Yeah. That's what i wanted to hear. I can't figure the last scene out, the one with kurt. He seems lonely and lost, but hyper-ecstatic at the same time. Did he find the freedom that Mark lost?
It didn't seem to me that he found true freedom because he was still trapped in his idea of a freedom that feared commitment. And freedom tainted with fear, I believe, is not true freedom. But he is still young enough for me to think that time and loneliness can help him overcome that particular fear.
He had had commitment wrenched from him from mark. Is he supposed to try to find commitment again the way that mark found it: Grow up, find a wife, settle down? Both characters ends seemed to have a downside, but at least kurt found the courage to initiate newness. I mean, imagine if Mark truly accepted Kurt's inclusivity, for lack of a better word. They could build such a strong bond together. I almost think that was the point at the end of the film, mark's lack of work on the relationship left the both of them adrift and yearning. Can you imagine anything more insipid to say than when Mark told Kurt, "That was awesome, Kurt," at the end of the trip. I think to myself, "That's it? You fool! You're on the verge of a new world, and all you can say is, 'that was awesome'!?" Then he goes on his way vacantly back to a world in which he acts purely as a bystander, back to a vapid world that prefigures him as a number, a vote to be counted, a member of the choir. I guess we all make mistakes, but i find mark's lack of personal work on his relationship with Kurt and his failure to acknowledge and satisfy his own emotional needs to be the tragic flaw in the lives of the characters in the movie and indeed, possibly the scourge of the modern (thirty-something) man.
Yes, Mark, unlike Kurt, has grown up and settled down. That's why I felt that they could never go back to that old joy they once had. They were now two very different individuals with much less in common. The tragedy, if you want to see it that way, is not that Mark missed the chance to grow the relationship, but that these former friends no longer seemed right for each other.
I think weighing Kurt's boho life as 'lonely and lost', well, I know a lot of home owning, married with children types who qualify as 'lonely and lost'. That's the good thing about this film -- if you're allowed to watch in peace, you can bring you luggage to the table.
I was forced to see which character I most resembled, and found I was moderate, not as extreme as these two.